Laíns, IBartosch, CMondim, VHealy, BKim, IKHusain, DMiller, JW2017-06-082017-06-082016-05Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 May;165:54-64http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/2697PURPOSE: To determine the risk of second primary neoplasms (SPNs) in subjects previously diagnosed with uveal melanoma (UM), including an analysis on whether radiotherapy is a risk factor to develop these SPNs. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 9 database, we identified patients diagnosed with UM as their first malignancy between 1973 and 2011 (n = 3976). We obtained standardized incidence ratios (SIR) and excess absolute risks of SPNs on patients with UM compared to a reference population. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to evaluate the effect of radiotherapy in SPN risk. RESULTS: Sixteen percent (n = 641) of the patients developed SPNs during a median follow-up of 83 months (range, 1-463 months). This represented an 11% excess risk compared to the reference population, mainly owing to a significantly increased risk of skin melanomas (SIR = 2.93, 95% CI: 2.23-3.78) and kidney tumors (SIR = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.27-2.76), primarily in those diagnosed between 30 and 59 years of age. The occurrence of second UM was also increased (SIR = 16.90, 95% CI: 9.00-28.90), which likely includes recurrences misclassified as a second cancer. Radiotherapy was performed in 39% (n = 1538) of the patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that this treatment was not an independent risk factor for SPNs (hazard ratio = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.88-1.26, P = .54). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with UM presented an 11% higher risk of SPNs compared to the reference population. Radiotherapy does not seem to be a risk factor. SPNs should be considered in the surveillance of UM.engAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Second PrimaryProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSEER ProgramUnited StatesUveal NeoplasmsCHLC ANSjournal article10.1016/j.ajo.2016.02.022