Browsing by Author "Bernardino, R"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- A Gencitabina como Alternativa Terapêutica na Ausência de BCG: A Experiência do CHLC (Hospital S. José)Publication . Andrade, V; Medeiros, M; Guimarães, T; Bernardino, R; Falcão, G; Fernandes, F; Farinha, R; Calais da Silva, F; Campos Pinheiro, LIntrodução: Os tumores não músculo invasivos da bexiga devem ser estratificados em grupos de risco de forma a adequar o tratamento após cirurgia a cada doente. Nos tumores de alto risco deve ser realizada terapêutica adjuvante com bacilo de Calmette-Guérin (BCG) intravesical durante 1 a 3 anos. Têm sido reportadas roturas de stock de BCG intravesical, tendo sido o Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central (CHLC) afectado nos anos 2014 e 2015, o que obrigou a uma reformulação no tratamento dos doentes que tinham indicação para realização desta terapêutica. A gencitabina poderá ser uma alternativa válida, dado que alguns estudos mostram que poderá ter um papel nos doentes de risco intermédio, como alternativa à mitomicina C, e nos de alto risco, refractários à BCG, com um perfil de toxicidade mais favorável. Material e Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo retrospectivo descritivo que incluiu doentes com tumores da bexiga não musculo-invasivos de alto risco, com início da doença em 2013/2014, afectados pelo período de escassez de BCG no Centro Hospitalar. Resultados: No CHLC, 11 doentes com tumores de alto risco foram submetidos a terapêutica com gencitabina, apenas dois exclusivamente, os restantes sequencialmente com BCG. Apenas dois doentes, tratados com BCG e gencitabina, apresentaram recidiva tumoral. No entanto, um número significativo (6 em 11) sofreram efeitos adversos, dois dos quais que levaram à interrupção da terapêutica. Conclusão: Aparentemente, a gencitabina foi uma boa alternativa de terapêutica adjuvante na ausência do tratamento gold standard (BCG), dada a existência de baixo número de recidivais tumorais, apesar do elevado número de efeitos adversos reportados.
- A Multinational Study of The Impact of Covid-19 On Urologic Surgery Residency and WellbeingPublication . Goldman, C; Pradere, B; Mete, M; Talso, M; Bernardino, R; Campi, R; Marchalik, DObjective: To assess changes to the experiences and wellbeing of urology trainees in the United States (US) and European Union (EU) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A 72-item anonymous online survey was distributed September 2020 to urology residents of Italy, France, Portugal, and the US. The survey assessed burnout, professional fulfillment, loneliness, depression and anxiety as well as 38 COVID specific questions. Results: Two hundred twenty-three urology residents responded to the survey. Surgical exposure was the main educational concern for 81% of US and 48% of EU residents. E-learning was utilized by 100% of US and 57% of EU residents with two-thirds finding it equally or more useful than traditional didactics. No significant differences were seen comparing burnout, professional fulfillment, depression, anxiety, or loneliness among US or EU residents, 73% of US and 71% of EU residents reported good to excellent quality of life during the pandemic. In the US and EU, significantly less time was spent in the hospital, clinic, and operating room (P <.001) and residents spent more time using telehealth and working from home during the pandemic and on research projects, didactic lectures, non-medical hobbies and reading. The majority of residents reported benefit from more schedule flexibility, improved work life balance, and increased time for family, hobbies, education, and research. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant restructuring of residents' educational experience around the globe. Preservation of beneficial changes such as reduction of work hours and online learning should be pursued within this pandemic and beyond it.
- Q Fever: an Emerging Reality in PortugalPublication . Lencastre Monteiro, R; Nascimento, R; Diogo, J; Bernardino, R; Leão, RQ fever is a zoonosis caused by Coxiella burnetii with worldwide distribution at the increasing expression in Europe and endemic in Portugal. It is transmitted by inhalation of aerosols containing spores, main reservoir being cattle, goats and sheep as by ingesting cottage cheese or unpasteurized milk. The majority of patients are asymptomatic; however, they may present with fever, atypical pneumonia, acute hepatitis, cutaneous manifestations and rarely with cardiac or neurological involvement. Although most cases are self-limited, focal persistent or chronic Q fever can manifest years after the onset, wherefore follow-up is essential. The clinical heterogeneity may be so variable that the disease is often diagnosed only if it has been systematically considered. It should be especially taken into account in the presence of risk factors as valvular or joint prostheses, immunocompromised patients, pregnant women and epidemiological setting. The authors present a rare case of Coxiella burnetii pneumonia with cutaneous and hepatic manifestations without any risk factor. This case aims to emphasize the importance of Q fever in the differential diagnosis of fever or atypical pneumonia, even in the absence of known risk factors. The diagnosis is often challenging for clinicians and it is necessary to maintain a high index of suspicion. In Europe and specifically in Portugal is mandatory to report the cases to establish the real impact of this disease.
- The Impact of Multidisciplinary Team Conferences in Urologic Cancer in a Tertiary HospitalPublication . Gil, M; Guerra, J; Andrade, V; Medeiros, M; Guimarães, T; Bernardino, R; Falcão, G; Calais da Silva, F; Campos Pinheiro, LPurpose: Multidisciplinary team (MDT) conferences are currently the standard of care in cancer patients' management. Despite evidence supporting benefits to the majority of malignancies, a paucity of data exists examining the impact in urinary and male genital cancers. This study aims to evaluate the impact of MDT conferences in urologic cancer practice. Methods: Clinical plans discussed in urologic MDT conferences in Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central between January 2019 and December 2019 were retrospectively analysed. Clinical plans were categorized as accepted, changed, rejected (cases that had to be re-presented to the MDT because of insufficient staging or administrative issues) or no plan. MDT conferences' impact was assessed according to type of consultation, referral medical specialty and primary tumour type. Results: 710 clinical plans were discussed at the MDT conferences. 61.8% were accepted, 10.6% were changed, 16.5% were rejected and 11.1% of cases referred to MDT discussion had no defined clinical plan. First consultations had a higher rate of accepted clinical plans (63.4%) versus subsequent consultations (56.4%). Referrals by the urology specialty had the highest rate of acceptances (64.3%). On the stratification by primary tumour site, testicular cancer had the highest acceptance rate (70.3%), whereas bladder cancer had the lowest (47.8%). Conclusions: MDT conferences had an important impact in the management of 38.2% of cases. Therefore, all patients with urologic malignancies should be referred to MDT review to ensure optimal clinical care.