Logo do repositório

Repositório da Unidade Local de Saúde São José

Repositório Científico da Instituição

 

Entradas recentes

Physical Activity in Vascular Cognitive Impairment: Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.
Publication . Vítor, Joana; Melita, Catarina; Rodrigues, Mário; Aguiar de Sousa, Diana; Costa, João; Ferro, J M; Verdelho, Ana
Background: Vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) is the second most common cause of cognitive impairment worldwide and includes a spectrum from vascular cognitive impairment no dementia (VCIND) to vascular dementia (VaD). There is no specific pharmacological treatment approved for VCI. Physical activity has been indicated to be a promising preventive measure for cognition, with direct as indirectly benefits, while improving several modifiable vascular risk factors, so potentially effective when considering VCI. Our aim was to conduct a systematic review with a meta-analysis approaching the potential preventive role of physical activity on VCI. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in 7 databases. A total of 6786 studies were screened and assessed for eligibility, culminating in the inclusion of 9 observational prospective studies assessing physical activity impact irrespectively the type for quality assessment and qualitative and quantitative synthesis. Quantitative synthesis was performed using the reported adjusted HRs. Physical activity was handled as a dichotomous variable, with two groups created (high versus low physical activity). Subgroup analyses were done for risk of bias, VaD and length of follow-up. Results: There was considerable methodological heterogeneity across studies. Only three studies reported significant associations. The overall effect was statistically significant (HR 0.68, 95%CI 0.54-0.86, I2 6.8%), with higher levels of physical activity associated with a smaller risk of VCI overtime, particularly VaD. Conclusions: These findings suggest that physical activity is a potential preventive factor for vascular dementia. Insufficient data is available on VCIND. Randomized studies are desired to confirm these results.
Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion: A Fragility Index Meta-Analysis.
Publication . Palaiodimou, Lina; Eleftheriou, Andreas; Katsanos, Aristeidis H; Safouris, Apostolos; Magoufis, Georgios; Spiliopoulos, Stavros; Velonakis, Georgios; Vassilopoulou, Sofia; de Sousa, Diana Aguiar; Turc, Guillaume; Strbian, Daniel; Tsivgoulis, Georgios
Introduction: High-quality evidence regarding the use of endovascular treatment (EVT) in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) has been provided by recently completed randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs). Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis including all available RCTs that investigated efficacy and safety of EVT in addition to best medical treatment (BMT) versus BMT alone for BAO. The random-effects model was used, while the fragility index (FI) was calculated for dichotomous outcomes of interest. Results: Four RCTs were included comprising a total of 988 patients with acute BAO (mean age: 65.6 years, 70% men, median NIHSS: 24, 39% pretreatment with intravenous thrombolysis). EVT was related to higher likelihood of good functional outcome (RR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.16-2.05; I2 = 60%), functional independence (RR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.08-3.08; I2 = 79%) and reduced disability at 3 months (adjusted common OR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.26-3.05; I2 = 59%) compared to BMT alone. Despite that EVT was associated with a higher risk for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (RR: 7.78; 95% CI: 2.36-25.61; I2 = 0%) and any intracranial hemorrhage (RR: 2.85; 95% CI: 1.50-5.44; I2 = 16%), mortality at 3 months was lower among patients that received EVT plus BMT versus BMT alone (RR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.65-0.89; I2 = 0%). However, sufficient robustness was not evident in any of the reported associations (FI < 10) including the overall effect regarding the primary outcome. The former associations were predominantly driven by RCTs with recruitment limited in China. Conclusions: EVT combined with BMT is associated with a higher likelihood of achieving good functional outcomes and a lower risk of death at 3 months compared to BMT alone, despite the higher risk of sICH. An individual-patient data meta-analysis is warranted to uncover and adjust for potential sources of heterogeneity and to provide further insight.
Early Detection of Interstitial Lung Disease in Rheumatic Diseases: a Joint Statement From the Portuguese Pulmonology Society, the Portuguese Rheumatology Society, and the Portuguese Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Society.
Publication . Morais, A; Duarte, A C; Fernandes, M O; Borba, A; Ruano, C; Marques, I D; Calha, J; Branco, J C; Pereira, J M; Salvador, M J; Bernardes, M; Khmelinskii, N; Pinto, P; Pinto-Basto, R; Freitas, S; Campainha, S; Alfaro, T; Cordeiro, A
Introduction: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality in connective tissue disease (CTD). Early detection and accurate diagnosis are essential for informing treatment decisions and prognosis in this setting. Clear guidance on CTD-ILD screening, however, is lacking. Objective: To establish recommendations for CTD-ILD screening based on the current evidence. Method: Following an extensive literature research and evaluation of articles selected for their recency and relevance to the characterization, screening, and management of CTD-ILD, an expert panel formed by six pulmonologists from the Portuguese Society of Pulmonology, six rheumatologists from the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology, and six radiologists from the Portuguese Society of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine participated in a multidisciplinary discussion to produce a joint statement on screening recommendations for ILD in CTD. Results: The expert panel achieved consensus on when and how to screen for ILD in patients with systemic sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, mixed connective tissue disease, Sjögren syndrome, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and systemic lupus erythematous. Conclusions: Despite the lack of data on screening for CTD-ILD, an expert panel of pulmonologists, rheumatologists and radiologists agreed on a series of screening recommendations to support decision-making and enable early diagnosis of ILD to ultimately improve outcomes and prognosis in patients with CTD.