Repository logo

Browsing by Author "Bollen Pinto, B"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Association of Chronic Heart Failure with Mortality in Old Intensive Care Patients Suffering from Covid‐19
    Publication . Romano Bruno, R; Wernly, B; Wolff, G; Fjølner, J; Artigas, A; Bollen Pinto, B; Schefold, J; Kindgen‐Milles, D; Baldia, P; Kelm, M; Beil, M; Sviri, S; Heerden, P; Szczeklik, W; Topeli, A; Elhadi, M; Joannidis, M; Oeyen, S; Kondili, E; Marsh, B; Andersen, F; Moreno, R; Leaver, S; Boumendil, A; De Lange, D; Guidet, B; Flaatten, H; Jung, C
    Aims: Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a major risk factor for mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This prospective international multicentre study investigates the role of pre-existing CHF on clinical outcomes of critically ill old (≥70 years) intensive care patients with COVID-19. Methods and results: Patients with pre-existing CHF were subclassified as having ischaemic or non-ischaemic cardiac disease; patients with a documented ejection fraction (EF) were subclassified according to heart failure EF: reduced (HFrEF, n = 132), mild (HFmrEF, n = 91), or preserved (HFpEF, n = 103). Associations of heart failure characteristics with the 30 day mortality were analysed in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Pre-existing CHF was reported in 566 of 3917 patients (14%). Patients with CHF were older, frailer, and had significantly higher SOFA scores on admission. CHF patients showed significantly higher crude 30 day mortality [60% vs. 48%, P < 0.001; odds ratio 1.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-2.3] and 3 month mortality (69% vs. 56%, P < 0.001). After multivariate adjustment for confounders (SOFA, age, sex, and frailty), no independent association of CHF with mortality remained [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.2, 95% CI 0.5-1.5; P = 0.137]. More patients suffered from pre-existing ischaemic than from non-ischaemic disease [233 vs. 328 patients (n = 5 unknown aetiology)]. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between ischaemic and non-ischaemic disease or between HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF. Crude 30 day mortality was significantly higher in HFrEF compared with HFpEF (64% vs. 48%, P = 0.042). EF as a continuous variable was not independently associated with 30 day mortality (aOR 0.98, 95% CI 0.9-1.0; P = 0.128). Conclusions: In critically ill older COVID-19 patients, pre-existing CHF was not independently associated with 30 day mortality.
    2022Journal article Open access Show more
  • Increased 30-Day Mortality in Very Old ICU Patients with COVID-19 Compared to Patients with Respiratory Failure without COVID-19
    Publication . Guidet, B; Jung, C; Flaatten, H; Fjølner, J; Artigas, A; Bollen Pinto, B; Schefold, J; Beil, M; Sigal, S; Vernon van Heerden, P; Szczeklik, W; Joannidis, M; Oeyen, S; Kondili, E; Marsh, B; Andersen, F; Moreno, R; Cecconi, M; Leaver, S; De Lange, D; Boumendil, A; Eller, P; Joannidis, M; Mesotten, D; Reper, P; Oeyen, S; Swinnen, W; Brix, H; Brushoej, J; Villefrance, M; Nedergaard, H; Bjerregaard, A; Balleby, I; Andersen, K; Hansen, M; Uhrenholt, S; Bundgaard, H; Fjølner, J; Hussein, A; Salah, R; Ali, Y; Wassim, K; Elgazzar, Y; Tharwat, S; Azzam, A; Habib, A; Abosheaishaa, H; Azab, M; Leaver, S; Galbois, A; Urbina, T; Charron, C; Guerot, E; Besch, G; Rigaud, JP; Maizel, J; Djibré, M; Burtin, P; Garcon, P; Nseir, S; Valette, X; Alexandru, N; Marin, N; Vaissiere, M; Plantefeve, G; Vanderlinden, T; Jurcisin, I; Megarbane, B; Caillard, A; Valent, A; Garnier, M; Besset, S; Oziel, J; Raphalen, J; Dauger, S; Dumas, G; Goncalves, B; Piton, G; Barth, E; Goebel, U; Barth, E; Kunstein, A; Schuster, M; Welte, M; Lutz, M; Meybohm, P; Steiner, S; Poerner, T; Haake, H; Schaller, S; Schaller, S; Schaller, S; Kindgen-Milles, D; Meyer, C; Kurt, M; Kuhn, K; Randerath, W; Wollborn, J; Dindane, Z; Kabitz, H; Voigt, I; Shala, G; Faltlhauser, A; Rovina, N; Aidoni, Z; Chrisanthopoulou, E; Papadogoulas, A; Gurjar, M; Mahmoodpoor, A; Ahmed, A; Marsh, B; Elsaka, A; Sviri, S; Comellini, V; Rabha, A; Ahmed, H; Namendys-Silva, S; Ghannam, A; Groenendijk, M; Zegers, M; de Lange, D; Cornet, A; Evers, M; Haas, L; Dormans, T; Dieperink, W; Romundstad, L; Sjøbø, B; Andersen, F; Strietzel, H; Olasveengen, T; Hahn, M; Czuczwar, M; Gawda, R; Klimkiewicz, J; Santos, ML; Gordinho, A; Santos, H; Assis, R; Oliveira, AI; Badawy, M; Perez-Torres, D; Gomà, G; Villamayor, M; Mira, A; Cubero, P; Rivera, S; Tomasa, T; Iglesias, D; Vázquez, E; Aldecoa, C; Ferreira, A; Zalba-Etayo, B; Canas-Perez, I; Tamayo-Lomas, L; Diaz-Rodriguez, C; Sancho, S; Priego, J; Abualqumboz, E; Hilles, M; Saleh, M; Ben-Hamouda, N; Roberti, A; Dullenkopf, A; Fleury, Y; Pinto, B; Schefold, J; Al-Sadaw, M
    Purpose: The number of patients ≥ 80 years admitted into critical care is increasing. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) added another challenge for clinical decisions for both admission and limitation of life-sustaining treatments (LLST). We aimed to compare the characteristics and mortality of very old critically ill patients with or without COVID-19 with a focus on LLST. Methods: Patients 80 years or older with acute respiratory failure were recruited from the VIP2 and COVIP studies. Baseline patient characteristics, interventions in intensive care unit (ICU) and outcomes (30-day survival) were recorded. COVID patients were matched to non-COVID patients based on the following factors: age (± 2 years), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (± 2 points), clinical frailty scale (± 1 point), gender and region on a 1:2 ratio. Specific ICU procedures and LLST were compared between the cohorts by means of cumulative incidence curves taking into account the competing risk of discharge and death. Results: 693 COVID patients were compared to 1393 non-COVID patients. COVID patients were younger, less frail, less severely ill with lower SOFA score, but were treated more often with invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) and had a lower 30-day survival. 404 COVID patients could be matched to 666 non-COVID patients. For COVID patients, withholding and withdrawing of LST were more frequent than for non-COVID and the 30-day survival was almost half compared to non-COVID patients. Conclusion: Very old COVID patients have a different trajectory than non-COVID patients. Whether this finding is due to a decision policy with more active treatment limitation or to an inherent higher risk of death due to COVID-19 is unclear.
    2022-04Journal article Open access Show more
  • Sepsis at ICU Admission Does Not Decrease 30-Day Survival in Very Old Patients: a Post-Hoc Analysis of the VIP1 Multinational Cohort Study
    Publication . Ibarz, M; Boumendil, A; Haas, L; Irazabal, M; Flaatten, H; de Lange, D; Morandi, A; Andersen, F; Bertolini, G; Cecconi, M; Christensen, S; Faraldi, L; Fjølner, J; Jung, C; Marsh, B; Moreno, R; Oeyen, S; Öhman, C; Bollen Pinto, B; Soliman, I; Szczeklik, W; Valentin, A; Watson, X; Zaferidis, T; Guidet, B; Artigas, A
    Background: The number of intensive care patients aged ≥ 80 years (Very old Intensive Care Patients; VIPs) is growing. VIPs have high mortality and morbidity and the benefits of ICU admission are frequently questioned. Sepsis incidence has risen in recent years and identification of outcomes is of considerable public importance. We aimed to determine whether VIPs admitted for sepsis had different outcomes than those admitted for other acute reasons and identify potential prognostic factors for 30-day survival. Results: This prospective study included VIPs with Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores ≥ 2 acutely admitted to 307 ICUs in 21 European countries. Of 3869 acutely admitted VIPs, 493 (12.7%) [53.8% male, median age 83 (81-86) years] were admitted for sepsis. Sepsis was defined according to clinical criteria; suspected or demonstrated focus of infection and SOFA score ≥ 2 points. Compared to VIPs admitted for other acute reasons, VIPs admitted for sepsis were younger, had a higher SOFA score (9 vs. 7, p < 0.0001), required more vasoactive drugs [82.2% vs. 55.1%, p < 0.0001] and renal replacement therapies [17.4% vs. 9.9%; p < 0.0001], and had more life-sustaining treatment limitations [37.3% vs. 32.1%; p = 0.02]. Frailty was similar in both groups. Unadjusted 30-day survival was not significantly different between the two groups. After adjustment for age, gender, frailty, and SOFA score, sepsis had no impact on 30-day survival [HR 0.99 (95% CI 0.86-1.15), p = 0.917]. Inverse-probability weight (IPW)-adjusted survival curves for the first 30 days after ICU admission were similar for acute septic and non-septic patients [HR: 1.00 (95% CI 0.87-1.17), p = 0.95]. A matched-pair analysis in which patients with sepsis were matched with two control patients of the same gender with the same age, SOFA score, and level of frailty was also performed. A Cox proportional hazard regression model stratified on the matched pairs showed that 30-day survival was similar in both groups [57.2% (95% CI 52.7-60.7) vs. 57.1% (95% CI 53.7-60.1), p = 0.85]. Conclusions: After adjusting for organ dysfunction, sepsis at admission was not independently associated with decreased 30-day survival in this multinational study of 3869 VIPs. Age, frailty, and SOFA score were independently associated with survival.
    2020-05-13Journal article Open access Show more
  • Sex-Specific Outcome Disparities in Very Old Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Medicine: a Propensity Matched Analysis
    Publication . Wernly, B; Romano Bruno, R; Kelm, M; Boumendil, A; Morandi, A; Andersen, F; Artigas, A; Finazzi, S; Cecconi, M; Christensen, S; Faraldi, L; Lichtenauer, M; Muessig, J; Marsh, B; Moreno, R; Oeyen, S; Öhman, C; Bollen Pinto, B; Soliman, I; Szczeklik, W; Niederseer, D; Valentin, A; Watson, X; Leaver, S; Boulanger, C; Walther, S; Schefold, J; Joannidis, M; Nalapko, Y; Elhadi, M; Fjølner, J; Zafeiridis, T; De Lange, D; Guidet, B; Flaatten, H; Jung, C
    Female and male very elderly intensive patients (VIPs) might differ in characteristics and outcomes. We aimed to compare female versus male VIPs in a large, multinational collective of VIPs with regards to outcome and predictors of mortality. In total, 7555 patients were included in this analysis, 3973 (53%) male and 3582 (47%) female patients. The primary endpoint was 30-day-mortality. Baseline characteristics, data on management and geriatric scores including frailty assessed by Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) were documented. Two propensity scores (for being male) were obtained for consecutive matching, score 1 for baseline characteristics and score 2 for baseline characteristics and ICU management. Male VIPs were younger (83 ± 5 vs. 84 ± 5; p < 0.001), less often frail (CFS > 4; 38% versus 49%; p < 0.001) but evidenced higher SOFA (7 ± 6 versus 6 ± 6 points; p < 0.001) scores. After propensity score matching, no differences in baseline characteristics could be observed. In the paired analysis, the mortality in male VIPs was higher (mean difference 3.34% 95%CI 0.92-5.76%; p = 0.007) compared to females. In both multivariable logistic regression models correcting for propensity score 1 (aOR 1.15 95%CI 1.03-1.27; p = 0.007) and propensity score 2 (aOR 1.15 95%CI 1.04-1.27; p = 0.007) male sex was independently associated with higher odds for 30-day-mortality. Of note, male gender was not associated with ICU mortality (OR 1.08 95%CI 0.98-1.19; p = 0.14). Outcomes of elderly intensive care patients evidenced independent sex differences. Male sex was associated with adverse 30-day-mortality but not ICU-mortality. Further research to identify potential sex-specific risk factors after ICU discharge is warranted.Trial registration: NCT03134807 and NCT03370692; Registered on May 1, 2017 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03370692 .
    2020-10Journal article Open access Show more
  • Validation of the Clinical Frailty Score (CFS) in French Language
    Publication . Abraham, P; Courvoisier, DS; Annweiler, C; Lenoir, C; Millien, T; Dalmaz, F; Flaatten, H; Moreno, R; Christensen, S; de Lange, DW; Guidet, B; Bendjelid, K; Walder, B; Bollen Pinto, B
    Background: Very old critical ill patients are a rapid expanding group. To better understand the magnitude of the challenges involved in intensive care practice for an ageing population and discuss a rational allocation of resources, healthcare practitioners need a reliable evaluation of frailty. In order to promote the adequate use of the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) in a wider panel of countries, we aimed to develop, validate and characterise a French (FR) version from the original English (EN) CFS. Methods: We included participants recruited prospectively for the observational "The very old intensive care patient: A multinational prospective observation study" (VIP Study) at Geneva University Hospitals (FR speaking hospital). A FR version of the CFS was obtained by translation (EN- > FR) and back translation (FR- > EN). The final CFS-FR was then evaluated twice on the same participants with at least a 2-week interval by FR-speaking doctors and nurses. Results: Inter-rater reliability was 0.87 (95%CI: 0.76-0.93) between doctors for the original CFS version and 0.76 (95%CI: 0.57-0.87) between nurses for the FR version. Inter-rater variability between doctor and nurse was 0.75 (95%CI: 0.56-0.87) for the original version, and 0.73 (95%CI: 0.52-0.85) for the FR version. Test-retest (stability) with the original vs the FR version was 0.86 (95%CI: 0.72-0.93) for doctors and 0.87 (95%CI: 0.76-0.93) for nurses. Differences between the evaluations of the CFS-EN and CSF-FR were not different from 0, with a mean difference of 0.06 (95%CI -0.24, 0.36) for the EN version and - 0.03 (95%CI -0.47, 0.41) for the FR version. Average original version ratings were slightly lower than FR version ratings, though this difference did not reach significance: -0.29 (95%CI -0.54, 0.04). Conclusion: In this prospective cohort of very old intensive care participants we developed and tested the basic psychometric properties (internal consistency, reproducibility) of a French version of the CFS. This manuscript provides clinically meaningful psychometric properties that have not been previously reported in any other language, including in the original EN version. The French cultural adaptation of this CFS has adequate psychometric properties for doctors or nurses to evaluate frailty in very old intensive care patients.
    2019Journal article Open access Show more