Browsing by Author "Sanfins, V"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Importance of Cardiac Implantable Eletronic Devices in the Diagnosis of Sleep Apnea SyndromePublication . Ribeiro, S; Bonito, L; Guimarães, MJ; Português, J; Rodrigues, B; Alves, A; Durães, C; Ferreira, D; Sanfins, V; Lourenço, AIntroduction: Sleep Apnea Syndrome (SAS) is a prevalent respiratory disease with marked expression in the population with cardiovascular disease. The diagnosis is based on polysomnography. In patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED), the prevalence of SAS may reach 60%. The objective of this study was to evaluate the value of DEC in the SAS screening. Methods: Prospective study that included patients with CIED with sleep apnea algorithm. The frequency response function was activated and simplified polygraphy was performed. The data of the device were collected on the day of the polygraph. Results: The sample included 29 patients, with a mean age of 76.1 years, 71.4% of the male gender. The prevalence of SAS was 77%. For SAS, the agreement between polysomnography and the Pacemaker was Kappa = 0.54 (p = 0.001), 95% CI (0.28, 0.81) (moderate agreement); for moderate to severe SAS, the agreement was Kappa = 0.73 (p <0.001), 95% CI (0.49, 0.976) (substantial agreement). Severe SAS was obtained: sensitivity 60%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, negative predictive value 60% and diagnostic accuracy 75%; for moderate to severe SAS: sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 83%, positive predictive values of 90% and negative of 87.5%, with a diagnostic accuracy of 87.5%. Conclusion: SAS is highly prevalent in patients with CIED. The values obtained through these devices have a strong positive correlation with the Apnea-Hypopnea Índex, which makes them a good tool for the screening of severe SAS.
- Remote versus In-Office Monitoring for Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: Results from a Randomized Pragmatic Controlled Study in PortugalPublication . Martins Oliveira, M; Fernandes, M; Reis, H; Primo, J; Sanfins, V; Silva, V; Silva Cunha, P; Silva, M; Nicola, P; PORTLink Study InvestigatorsIntroduction: Remote monitoring (RM) is a safe and effective alternative to in-office conventional follow-up. Objective: We aimed to evaluate patient satisfaction with RM and its impact on healthcare resources in a population with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Methods: Randomized, pragmatic, open-label controlled trial, with adult wearers of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy with ICD (CRT-D), eligible for the CareLink® system. Patients newly implanted or with previous conventional follow-up were randomized to RM or conventional follow-up (control), and followed for 12 months, according to the centers' practice. The number of in-office visits and adverse events were compared between groups. Patient and healthcare professionals' satisfaction with RM were described. Results: Of the 134 randomized patients (69 RM; 65 control, aged 60±13 years), 80% were male, 23% employed, 72% ICD wearers and 54% newly implanted. Most patients (70%) reported travel costs less than 15€/visit, and 46% daily routine interference with in-office visits. Median physician/technician time with patient was 15 min/15 min, per in-office visit. Excluding baseline and final visits, control patients had more in-office visits in total: median 1 vs. 0, p<0.001. In 81% of the in-office visits, no clinical measures were taken. There were 10 adverse events, with no differences between groups. At the final visit, 95% of RM patients considered RM easy/very easy to use, and would all prefer to maintain RM and recommend it to others. All professionals found the CareLink website easy/very easy to use and were satisfied with transmission data. Conclusions: In a Portuguese population with ICD and CRT-D, RM safely reduced the burden of in-office visits, with high levels of satisfaction among patients and healthcare professionals.