Browsing by Author "de Lange, D"
Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Increased 30-Day Mortality in Very Old ICU Patients with COVID-19 Compared to Patients with Respiratory Failure without COVID-19Publication . Guidet, B; Jung, C; Flaatten, H; Fjølner, J; Artigas, A; Bollen Pinto, B; Schefold, J; Beil, M; Sigal, S; Vernon van Heerden, P; Szczeklik, W; Joannidis, M; Oeyen, S; Kondili, E; Marsh, B; Andersen, F; Moreno, R; Cecconi, M; Leaver, S; De Lange, D; Boumendil, A; Eller, P; Joannidis, M; Mesotten, D; Reper, P; Oeyen, S; Swinnen, W; Brix, H; Brushoej, J; Villefrance, M; Nedergaard, H; Bjerregaard, A; Balleby, I; Andersen, K; Hansen, M; Uhrenholt, S; Bundgaard, H; Fjølner, J; Hussein, A; Salah, R; Ali, Y; Wassim, K; Elgazzar, Y; Tharwat, S; Azzam, A; Habib, A; Abosheaishaa, H; Azab, M; Leaver, S; Galbois, A; Urbina, T; Charron, C; Guerot, E; Besch, G; Rigaud, JP; Maizel, J; Djibré, M; Burtin, P; Garcon, P; Nseir, S; Valette, X; Alexandru, N; Marin, N; Vaissiere, M; Plantefeve, G; Vanderlinden, T; Jurcisin, I; Megarbane, B; Caillard, A; Valent, A; Garnier, M; Besset, S; Oziel, J; Raphalen, J; Dauger, S; Dumas, G; Goncalves, B; Piton, G; Barth, E; Goebel, U; Barth, E; Kunstein, A; Schuster, M; Welte, M; Lutz, M; Meybohm, P; Steiner, S; Poerner, T; Haake, H; Schaller, S; Schaller, S; Schaller, S; Kindgen-Milles, D; Meyer, C; Kurt, M; Kuhn, K; Randerath, W; Wollborn, J; Dindane, Z; Kabitz, H; Voigt, I; Shala, G; Faltlhauser, A; Rovina, N; Aidoni, Z; Chrisanthopoulou, E; Papadogoulas, A; Gurjar, M; Mahmoodpoor, A; Ahmed, A; Marsh, B; Elsaka, A; Sviri, S; Comellini, V; Rabha, A; Ahmed, H; Namendys-Silva, S; Ghannam, A; Groenendijk, M; Zegers, M; de Lange, D; Cornet, A; Evers, M; Haas, L; Dormans, T; Dieperink, W; Romundstad, L; Sjøbø, B; Andersen, F; Strietzel, H; Olasveengen, T; Hahn, M; Czuczwar, M; Gawda, R; Klimkiewicz, J; Santos, ML; Gordinho, A; Santos, H; Assis, R; Oliveira, AI; Badawy, M; Perez-Torres, D; Gomà, G; Villamayor, M; Mira, A; Cubero, P; Rivera, S; Tomasa, T; Iglesias, D; Vázquez, E; Aldecoa, C; Ferreira, A; Zalba-Etayo, B; Canas-Perez, I; Tamayo-Lomas, L; Diaz-Rodriguez, C; Sancho, S; Priego, J; Abualqumboz, E; Hilles, M; Saleh, M; Ben-Hamouda, N; Roberti, A; Dullenkopf, A; Fleury, Y; Pinto, B; Schefold, J; Al-Sadaw, MPurpose: The number of patients ≥ 80 years admitted into critical care is increasing. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) added another challenge for clinical decisions for both admission and limitation of life-sustaining treatments (LLST). We aimed to compare the characteristics and mortality of very old critically ill patients with or without COVID-19 with a focus on LLST. Methods: Patients 80 years or older with acute respiratory failure were recruited from the VIP2 and COVIP studies. Baseline patient characteristics, interventions in intensive care unit (ICU) and outcomes (30-day survival) were recorded. COVID patients were matched to non-COVID patients based on the following factors: age (± 2 years), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (± 2 points), clinical frailty scale (± 1 point), gender and region on a 1:2 ratio. Specific ICU procedures and LLST were compared between the cohorts by means of cumulative incidence curves taking into account the competing risk of discharge and death. Results: 693 COVID patients were compared to 1393 non-COVID patients. COVID patients were younger, less frail, less severely ill with lower SOFA score, but were treated more often with invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) and had a lower 30-day survival. 404 COVID patients could be matched to 666 non-COVID patients. For COVID patients, withholding and withdrawing of LST were more frequent than for non-COVID and the 30-day survival was almost half compared to non-COVID patients. Conclusion: Very old COVID patients have a different trajectory than non-COVID patients. Whether this finding is due to a decision policy with more active treatment limitation or to an inherent higher risk of death due to COVID-19 is unclear.
- Prognosticating the Outcome of Intensive Care in Older Patients - a Narrative ReviewPublication . Beil, M; Moreno, R; Fronczek, J; Kogan, Y; Moreno, R; Flaatten, H; Guidet, B; de Lange, D; Leaver, S; Nachshon, A; van Heerden, P; Joskowicz, L; Sviri, S; Jung, C; Szczeklik, WPrognosis determines major decisions regarding treatment for critically ill patients. Statistical models have been developed to predict the probability of survival and other outcomes of intensive care. Although they were trained on the characteristics of large patient cohorts, they often do not represent very old patients (age ≥ 80 years) appropriately. Moreover, the heterogeneity within this particular group impairs the utility of statistical predictions for informing decision-making in very old individuals. In addition to these methodological problems, the diversity of cultural attitudes, available resources as well as variations of legal and professional norms limit the generalisability of prediction models, especially in patients with complex multi-morbidity and pre-existing functional impairments. Thus, current approaches to prognosticating outcomes in very old patients are imperfect and can generate substantial uncertainty about optimal trajectories of critical care in the individual. This article presents the state of the art and new approaches to predicting outcomes of intensive care for these patients. Special emphasis has been given to the integration of predictions into the decision-making for individual patients. This requires quantification of prognostic uncertainty and a careful alignment of decisions with the preferences of patients, who might prioritise functional outcomes over survival. Since the performance of outcome predictions for the individual patient may improve over time, time-limited trials in intensive care may be an appropriate way to increase the confidence in decisions about life-sustaining treatment.
- Sepsis at ICU Admission Does Not Decrease 30-Day Survival in Very Old Patients: a Post-Hoc Analysis of the VIP1 Multinational Cohort StudyPublication . Ibarz, M; Boumendil, A; Haas, L; Irazabal, M; Flaatten, H; de Lange, D; Morandi, A; Andersen, F; Bertolini, G; Cecconi, M; Christensen, S; Faraldi, L; Fjølner, J; Jung, C; Marsh, B; Moreno, R; Oeyen, S; Öhman, C; Bollen Pinto, B; Soliman, I; Szczeklik, W; Valentin, A; Watson, X; Zaferidis, T; Guidet, B; Artigas, ABackground: The number of intensive care patients aged ≥ 80 years (Very old Intensive Care Patients; VIPs) is growing. VIPs have high mortality and morbidity and the benefits of ICU admission are frequently questioned. Sepsis incidence has risen in recent years and identification of outcomes is of considerable public importance. We aimed to determine whether VIPs admitted for sepsis had different outcomes than those admitted for other acute reasons and identify potential prognostic factors for 30-day survival. Results: This prospective study included VIPs with Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores ≥ 2 acutely admitted to 307 ICUs in 21 European countries. Of 3869 acutely admitted VIPs, 493 (12.7%) [53.8% male, median age 83 (81-86) years] were admitted for sepsis. Sepsis was defined according to clinical criteria; suspected or demonstrated focus of infection and SOFA score ≥ 2 points. Compared to VIPs admitted for other acute reasons, VIPs admitted for sepsis were younger, had a higher SOFA score (9 vs. 7, p < 0.0001), required more vasoactive drugs [82.2% vs. 55.1%, p < 0.0001] and renal replacement therapies [17.4% vs. 9.9%; p < 0.0001], and had more life-sustaining treatment limitations [37.3% vs. 32.1%; p = 0.02]. Frailty was similar in both groups. Unadjusted 30-day survival was not significantly different between the two groups. After adjustment for age, gender, frailty, and SOFA score, sepsis had no impact on 30-day survival [HR 0.99 (95% CI 0.86-1.15), p = 0.917]. Inverse-probability weight (IPW)-adjusted survival curves for the first 30 days after ICU admission were similar for acute septic and non-septic patients [HR: 1.00 (95% CI 0.87-1.17), p = 0.95]. A matched-pair analysis in which patients with sepsis were matched with two control patients of the same gender with the same age, SOFA score, and level of frailty was also performed. A Cox proportional hazard regression model stratified on the matched pairs showed that 30-day survival was similar in both groups [57.2% (95% CI 52.7-60.7) vs. 57.1% (95% CI 53.7-60.1), p = 0.85]. Conclusions: After adjusting for organ dysfunction, sepsis at admission was not independently associated with decreased 30-day survival in this multinational study of 3869 VIPs. Age, frailty, and SOFA score were independently associated with survival.
- The Contribution of Frailty, Cognition, Activity of Daily Life and Comorbidities on Outcome in Acutely Admitted Patients Over 80 Years in European ICUs: the VIP2 StudyPublication . Guidet, B; de Lange, D; Boumendil, A; Leaver, S; Watson, X; Boulanger, C; Szczeklik, W; Artigas, A; Morandi, A; Andersen, F; Zafeiridis, T; Jung, C; Moreno, R; Walther, S; Oeyen, S; Schefold, J; Cecconi, M; Marsh, B; Joannidis, M; Nalapko, Y; Elhadi, M; Fjølner, J; Flaatten, HPurpose: Premorbid conditions affect prognosis of acutely-ill aged patients. Several lines of evidence suggest geriatric syndromes need to be assessed but little is known on their relative effect on the 30-day survival after ICU admission. The primary aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of frailty, cognition decline and activity of daily life in addition to the presence of comorbidity and polypharmacy and to assess their influence on 30-day survival. Methods: Prospective cohort study with 242 ICUs from 22 countries. Patients 80 years or above acutely admitted over a six months period to an ICU between May 2018 and May 2019 were included. In addition to common patients' characteristics and disease severity, we collected information on specific geriatric syndromes as potential predictive factors for 30-day survival, frailty (Clinical Frailty scale) with a CFS > 4 defining frail patients, cognitive impairment (informant questionnaire on cognitive decline in the elderly (IQCODE) with IQCODE ≥ 3.5 defining cognitive decline, and disability (measured the activity of daily life with the Katz index) with ADL ≤ 4 defining disability. A Principal Component Analysis to identify co-linearity between geriatric syndromes was performed and from this a multivariable model was built with all geriatric information or only one: CFS, IQCODE or ADL. Akaike's information criterion across imputations was used to evaluate the goodness of fit of our models. Results: We included 3920 patients with a median age of 84 years (IQR: 81-87), 53.3% males). 80% received at least one organ support. The median ICU length of stay was 3.88 days (IQR: 1.83-8). The ICU and 30-day survival were 72.5% and 61.2% respectively. The geriatric conditions were median (IQR): CFS: 4 (3-6); IQCODE: 3.19 (3-3.69); ADL: 6 (4-6); Comorbidity and Polypharmacy score (CPS): 10 (7-14). CFS, ADL and IQCODE were closely correlated. The multivariable analysis identified predictors of 1-month mortality (HR; 95% CI): Age (per 1 year increase): 1.02 (1.-1.03, p = 0.01), ICU admission diagnosis, sequential organ failure assessment score (SOFA) (per point): 1.15 (1.14-1.17, p < 0.0001) and CFS (per point): 1.1 (1.05-1.15, p < 0.001). CFS remained an independent factor after inclusion of life-sustaining treatment limitation in the model. Conclusion: We confirm that frailty assessment using the CFS is able to predict short-term mortality in elderly patients admitted to ICU. Other geriatric syndromes do not add improvement to the prediction model. Since CFS is easy to measure, it should be routinely collected for all elderly ICU patients in particular in connection to advance care plans, and should be used in decision making.
- The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score: Has the Time Come for an Update?Publication . Moreno, R; Rhodes, A; Piquilloud, L; Hernandez, G; Takala, J; Gershengorn, H; Tavares, M; Coopersmith, C; Myatra, S; Singer, M; Rezende, E; Prescott, H; Soares, M; Timsit, JF; de Lange, D; Jung, C; De Waele, J; Martin, G; Summers, C; Azoulay, E; Fujii, T; McLean, A; Vincent, JLThe Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score was developed more than 25 years ago to provide a simple method of assessing and monitoring organ dysfunction in critically ill patients. Changes in clinical practice over the last few decades, with new interventions and a greater focus on non-invasive monitoring systems, mean it is time to update the SOFA score. As a first step in this process, we propose some possible new variables that could be included in a SOFA 2.0. By so doing, we hope to stimulate debate and discussion to move toward a new, properly validated score that will be fit for modern practice.