Repository logo
 
Publication

Bone Densitometry Versus Bone Histomorphometry in Renal Transplanted Patients: A Cross‐Sectional Study

dc.contributor.authorFerreira, AC
dc.contributor.authorMendes, M
dc.contributor.authorSilva, C
dc.contributor.authorCotovio, P
dc.contributor.authorAires, I
dc.contributor.authorNavarro, D
dc.contributor.authorCaeiro, F
dc.contributor.authorSalvador, R
dc.contributor.authorCorreia, B
dc.contributor.authorCabral, G
dc.contributor.authorNolasco, F
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, A
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-29T15:58:55Z
dc.date.available2022-12-29T15:58:55Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractBone loss leads to increase risk of fractures in renal transplantation. The aim of this study was to analyse the relationship between bone densitometry (DXA) findings, bone histomorphometry and bone-related molecules 1-year after renal transplantation. We performed a cross-sectional study of de novo renal transplanted patients that agreed to perform a bone biopsy and a DXA examination 1 year after transplantation. All patients underwent a laboratory evaluation, bone biopsy, DXA examination and cardiac CT 1 year after transplantation. 67 patients were included, 16 had a normal examination, and 18 patients were classified as having osteoporosis by DXA. Correlations between bone mineral density and T-scores of total femur and femoral neck were the ones that best correlated with bone volume assessed by a bone biopsy. The sensitivity of DXA for osteoporosis diagnosis was 47.0%, and the specificity was 81.2%. The positive predictive value was 50.0%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 80.0%. DXA parameters also correlated with klotho and sclerostin serum levels. In this population, a normal examination excluded the presence of osteoporosis, helping in identifying patients that would not benefit from therapy. Overall, densitometry in total femur and femoral neck correlated well with bone volume measured by bone biopsy.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationTranspl Int . 2021 Jun;34(6):1065-1073pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/tri.13888pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/4351
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherWileypt_PT
dc.subjectAbsorptiometry, Photonpt_PT
dc.subjectBone Densitypt_PT
dc.subjectCross-Sectional Studiespt_PT
dc.subjectHCC NEFpt_PT
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectFemur Neck / diagnostic imaging
dc.subjectKidney Transplantation* / adverse effects
dc.titleBone Densitometry Versus Bone Histomorphometry in Renal Transplanted Patients: A Cross‐Sectional Studypt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage1073pt_PT
oaire.citation.issue6pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage1065pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleTransplant Internationalpt_PT
oaire.citation.volume34pt_PT
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Transplant Int 2021_1065.pdf
Size:
142.08 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections