Publication
Perioperative and Long-Term Outcome for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Impact of Major Versus Minor Hepatectomy
dc.contributor.author | Zhang, XF | |
dc.contributor.author | Bagante, F | |
dc.contributor.author | Chakedis, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Moris, D | |
dc.contributor.author | Beal, EW | |
dc.contributor.author | Weiss, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Popescu, I | |
dc.contributor.author | Pinto Marques, H | |
dc.contributor.author | Aldrighetti, L | |
dc.contributor.author | Maithel, SK | |
dc.contributor.author | Pulitano, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Bauer, TW | |
dc.contributor.author | Shen, F | |
dc.contributor.author | Poultsides, GA | |
dc.contributor.author | Soubrane, O | |
dc.contributor.author | Martel, G | |
dc.contributor.author | Groot Koerkamp, B | |
dc.contributor.author | Guglielmi, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Itaru, E | |
dc.contributor.author | Pawlik, TM | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-03-02T15:49:19Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-03-02T15:49:19Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-11 | |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: The objective of the current study was to investigate both short- and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing curative-intent resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) stratified by extent of hepatic resection relative to overall final pathological margin status. METHODS: One thousand twenty-three patients with ICC who underwent curative-intent resection were identified from a multi-institutional database. Demographic, clinicopathological, and operative data, as well as overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared among patients undergoing major and minor resection before and after propensity score matching. RESULTS: Overall, 608 (59.4%) patients underwent major hepatectomy, while 415 (40.6%) had a minor resection. Major hepatectomy was more frequently performed among patients who had large, multiple, and bilobar tumors. Roughly half of patients (n = 294, 48.4%) developed a postoperative complication following major hepatectomy versus only one fourth of patients (n = 113, 27.2%) after minor resection (p < 0.001). In the propensity model, patients who underwent major hepatectomy had an equivalent OS and RFS versus patients who had a minor hepatectomy (median OS, 38 vs. 37 months, p = 0.556; and median RFS, 20 vs. 18 months, p = 0.635). Patients undergoing major resection had comparable OS and RFS with wide surgical margin (≥10 and 5-9 mm), but improved RFS when surgical margin was narrow (1-4 mm) versus minor resection in the propensity model. In the Cox regression model, tumor characteristics and surgical margin were independently associated with long-term outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Major hepatectomy for ICC was not associated with an overall survival benefit, yet was associated with increased perioperative morbidity. Margin width, rather than the extent of resection, affected long-term outcomes. Radical parenchymal-sparing resection should be advocated if a margin clearance of ≥5 mm can be achieved. | pt_PT |
dc.description.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | pt_PT |
dc.identifier.citation | J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Nov;21(11):1841-1850. | pt_PT |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s11605-017-3499-6 | pt_PT |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/2926 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | pt_PT |
dc.peerreviewed | yes | pt_PT |
dc.publisher | Springer Verlag | pt_PT |
dc.subject | HCC CIR | pt_PT |
dc.subject | Bile Duct Neoplasms/mortality | pt_PT |
dc.subject | Bile Duct Neoplasms/pathology | pt_PT |
dc.subject | Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery | pt_PT |
dc.subject | Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic/surgery | pt_PT |
dc.subject | Cholangiocarcinoma/mortality | pt_PT |
dc.subject | Cholangiocarcinoma/pathology | |
dc.subject | Cholangiocarcinoma/surgery | |
dc.subject | Cohort Studies | |
dc.subject | Hepatectomy | |
dc.subject | Survival Analysis | |
dc.subject | Treatment Outcome | |
dc.title | Perioperative and Long-Term Outcome for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Impact of Major Versus Minor Hepatectomy | pt_PT |
dc.type | journal article | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
oaire.citation.endPage | 1850 | pt_PT |
oaire.citation.issue | 11 | pt_PT |
oaire.citation.startPage | 1841 | pt_PT |
oaire.citation.title | Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | pt_PT |
oaire.citation.volume | 21 | pt_PT |
rcaap.rights | openAccess | pt_PT |
rcaap.type | article | pt_PT |