Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1016.45 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
PURPOSE:
To analyze the relationship between hypercapnia developing within the first 48 h after the start of mechanical ventilation and outcome in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
We performed a secondary analysis of three prospective non-interventional cohort studies focusing on ARDS patients from 927 intensive care units (ICUs) in 40 countries. These patients received mechanical ventilation for more than 12 h during 1-month periods in 1998, 2004, and 2010. We used multivariable logistic regression and a propensity score analysis to examine the association between hypercapnia and ICU mortality.
MAIN OUTCOMES:
We included 1899 patients with ARDS in this study. The relationship between maximum PaCO2 in the first 48 h and mortality suggests higher mortality at or above PaCO2 of ≥50 mmHg. Patients with severe hypercapnia (PaCO2 ≥50 mmHg) had higher complication rates, more organ failures, and worse outcomes. After adjusting for age, SAPS II score, respiratory rate, positive end-expiratory pressure, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, driving pressure, pressure/volume limitation strategy (PLS), corrected minute ventilation, and presence of acidosis, severe hypercapnia was associated with increased risk of ICU mortality [odds ratio (OR) 1.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.32 to 2.81; p = 0.001]. In patients with severe hypercapnia matched for all other variables, ventilation with PLS was associated with higher ICU mortality (OR 1.58, CI 95% 1.04-2.41; p = 0.032).
CONCLUSIONS:
Severe hypercapnia appears to be independently associated with higher ICU mortality in patients with ARDS.
Description
Keywords
Adult Aged Female Humans Hypercapnia Logistic Models Male Middle Aged Propensity Score Prospective Studies Respiration, Artificial Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult Severity of Illness Index Simplified Acute Physiology Score Time Factors Intensive Care Units CHLC UCI
Citation
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Feb;43(2):200-208