Repository logo
 
Publication

Cardiac Pacing in Severe Recurrent Reflex Syncope and Tilt-Induced Asystole

dc.contributor.authorBrignole, M
dc.contributor.authorRusso, V
dc.contributor.authorArabia, F
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, MM
dc.contributor.authorPedrote, A
dc.contributor.authorAerts, A
dc.contributor.authorRapacciuolo, A
dc.contributor.authorBoveda, S
dc.contributor.authorDeharo, JC
dc.contributor.authorMaglia, G
dc.contributor.authorNigro, G
dc.contributor.authorGiacopelli, D
dc.contributor.authorGargaro, A
dc.contributor.authorTomaino, M
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-13T14:34:24Z
dc.date.available2021-10-13T14:34:24Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractAim: The benefit of cardiac pacing in patients with severe recurrent reflex syncope and asystole induced by tilt testing has not been established. The usefulness of tilt-table test to select candidates for cardiac pacing is controversial. Methods and results: We randomly assigned patients aged 40 years or older who had at least two episodes of unpredictable severe reflex syncope during the last year and a tilt-induced syncope with an asystolic pause longer than 3 s, to receive either an active (pacing ON; 63 patients) or an inactive (pacing OFF; 64 patients) dual-chamber pacemaker with closed loop stimulation (CLS). The primary endpoint was the time to first recurrence of syncope. Patients and independent outcome assessors were blinded to the assigned treatment. After a median follow-up of 11.2 months, syncope occurred in significantly fewer patients in the pacing group than in the control group [10 (16%) vs. 34 (53%); hazard ratio, 0.23; P = 0.00005]. The estimated syncope recurrence rate at 1 year was 19% (pacing) and 53% (control) and at 2 years, 22% (pacing) and 68% (control). A combined endpoint of syncope or presyncope occurred in significantly fewer patients in the pacing group [23 (37%) vs. 40 (63%); hazard ratio, 0.44; P = 0.002]. Minor device-related adverse events were reported in five patients (4%). Conclusion: In patients aged 40 years or older, affected by severe recurrent reflex syncope and tilt-induced asystole, dual-chamber pacemaker with CLS is highly effective in reducing the recurrences of syncope. Our findings support the inclusion of tilt testing as a useful method to select candidates for cardiac pacing.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationEur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):508-516.pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa936.pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3879
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherEuropean Society of Cardiologypt_PT
dc.subjectHSM CARpt_PT
dc.subjectAdultpt_PT
dc.subjectCardiac Pacing, Artificial*pt_PT
dc.subjectHumanspt_PT
dc.subjectHeart Arrest* / etiologypt_PT
dc.subjectHeart Arrest* / therapypt_PT
dc.subjectReflexpt_PT
dc.subjectSyncope / etiologypt_PT
dc.subjectSyncope / therapypt_PT
dc.subjectTilt-Table Testpt_PT
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomept_PT
dc.titleCardiac Pacing in Severe Recurrent Reflex Syncope and Tilt-Induced Asystolept_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage516pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage508pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleEuropean Heart Journalpt_PT
oaire.citation.volume42pt_PT
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Eur Heart J 2021 508.pdf
Size:
905.64 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections