Repository logo
 
Publication

sFlt-1/PlGF Ratio for the Predictive Diagnosis of Preeclampsia: Budget Impact Analysis from the Public Healthcare Perspective in Portugal

dc.contributor.authorCampos, A
dc.contributor.authorMachado, AP
dc.contributor.authorMartins, H
dc.contributor.authorJosé Pais, MS
dc.contributor.authorÉrsek, K
dc.contributor.authorLopes, N
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-28T14:12:42Z
dc.date.available2022-07-28T14:12:42Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractOverview and Aims: The last decade brought relevant insights into the pathophysiology of preeclampsia (PE), namely the role of the circulating levels of placental growth factor (PlGF) and soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1). The purpose of this study is to estimate the financial impact of introducing the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio for the evaluation of women with suspicion of PE in the Portuguese National Healthcare System (SNS). Study Design: budget impact study evaluating short-term costs associated with the introduction of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio from the SNS payer’s perspective. The time horizon for the study is 1 year. Population: The target population consists of women presenting to the healthcare system with signs or symptoms su ggestive of preeclampsia (estimated in 8500 subjects). Methods: A decision-tree model was used to estimate the budget impact of the introduction of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in the SNS. The model compares the management costs in the current clinical practice (“no test” scenario) vs. current diagnostic procedures plus the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio (“test” scenario). Clinical inputs have been derived primarily from literature review and, where data was unavailable, expert opinion. Resources and unit costs have been obtained from Portugal-specific sources. Results: In the current standard practice (no test), total costs were estimated to be €9 863 264 (€1160 per patient), with unnecessary admissions representing about €3,5 million. Total costs in the test scenario sum up to €9 781 194 (€1150 per patient), representing a cost saving to the system of €82 070 (€10 per patient), mainly due to a reduction of false positives and related unnecessary hospitalizations of women not developing PE. Conclusions: There is favorable economic evidence about the introduction of the sFlt- 1/PlGF ratio in the SNS. The generated savings appear to offset the costs related to the test.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationActa Obstet Ginecol Port 2019;13(2):82-90pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/4165
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherFederação das Sociedades Portuguesas de Obstetrícia e Ginecologiapt_PT
dc.subjectPreeclampsiapt_PT
dc.subjectPregnancypt_PT
dc.subjectBiomarkerspt_PT
dc.subjectCosts and Cost Analysispt_PT
dc.subjectMAC OBSpt_PT
dc.titlesFlt-1/PlGF Ratio for the Predictive Diagnosis of Preeclampsia: Budget Impact Analysis from the Public Healthcare Perspective in Portugalpt_PT
dc.title.alternativesFlt-1/PIGF no Diagnóstico Preditivo de Pré-eclâmpsia: Estudo de Impacto Económico em Portugalpt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage90pt_PT
oaire.citation.issue2pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage82pt_PT
oaire.citation.volume13pt_PT
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Acta Obstet Ginecol Port 2019_82.pdf
Size:
1.26 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections