Repository logo
 
Publication

Conversion of Adjustable Gastric Banding to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in One or Two Steps: What Is the Best Approach? Analysis of a Multicenter Database Concerning 832 Patients

dc.contributor.authorPujol-Rafols, J
dc.contributor.authorAbbas, A
dc.contributor.authorDevriendt, S
dc.contributor.authorGuerra, A
dc.contributor.authorHerrera, M
dc.contributor.authorHimpens, J
dc.contributor.authorPardina, E
dc.contributor.authorPouwels, S
dc.contributor.authorRamos, A
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, R
dc.contributor.authorSafadi, B
dc.contributor.authorSanchez-Aguilar, H
dc.contributor.authorVries, C
dc.contributor.authorWagensveld, B
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-29T14:11:59Z
dc.date.available2022-04-29T14:11:59Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractBackground: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is often the preferred conversion procedure for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) poor responders. However, there is controversy whether it is better to convert in one or two stages. This study aims to compare the outcomes of one and two-stage conversions of LAGB to RYGB. Methods: Retrospective review of a multicenter prospectively collected database. Data on conversion in one and two stages was compared. Results: Eight hundred thirty-two patients underwent LAGB conversion to RYGB in seven specialized bariatric centers. Six hundred seventy-three (81%) were converted in one-stage. Patients in the two-stage group were more likely to have experienced technical complications, such as slippage or erosions (86% vs. 37%, p = 0.0001) and to have had a higher body mass index (BMI) (41.6 vs. 39.9 Kg/m2, p = 0.005). There were no differences in postoperative complications and mortality rates between the one-stage and two-stage groups (13.5% vs. 10.8%, and 0.7% vs. 0.0% respectively, p = ns). Mean final BMI and %total weight loss (%TWL) for the one-stage and the two-stage groups were 31.6 vs. 32.4 Kg/m2 (p = ns) and 30.4 vs. 26.8 (p = 0.017) after a mean follow-up of 33 months. Follow-up at 1, 3, and 5 years was 98%, 75%, and 54%, respectively. Conclusions: One-stage conversion of LAGB to RYGB is safe and effective. Two-stage conversion carries low morbidity and mortality in the case of band slippage, erosion, or higher BMI patients. These findings suggest the importance of patient selection when choosing the appropriate conversion approach.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationObes Surg. 2020 Dec;30(12):5026-5032.pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11695-020-04951-0.pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/4056
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherSpringerpt_PT
dc.subjectCHLC CIRpt_PT
dc.subjectHumanspt_PT
dc.subjectGastric Bypass*pt_PT
dc.subjectGastroplasty*pt_PT
dc.subjectLaparoscopy*pt_PT
dc.subjectObesity, Morbid* / surgerypt_PT
dc.subjectPostoperative Complications / epidemiologypt_PT
dc.subjectPostoperative Complications / surgerypt_PT
dc.subjectReoperationpt_PT
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomept_PT
dc.subjectRetrospective Studiespt_PT
dc.titleConversion of Adjustable Gastric Banding to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in One or Two Steps: What Is the Best Approach? Analysis of a Multicenter Database Concerning 832 Patientspt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage5032pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage5026pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleObesity Surgerypt_PT
oaire.citation.volume30pt_PT
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Obes Surg 2020 5026.pdf
Size:
235.22 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections