Repository logo
 
Publication

Specificity and Sensitivity of Screening for Anti-HLA Antibodies in Kidney Allograft Dysfunction

dc.contributor.authorViana, H
dc.contributor.authorNolasco, F
dc.contributor.authorSantos, MC
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, F
dc.contributor.authorGalvão, MJ
dc.contributor.authorSantos, AR
dc.contributor.authorBordalo, J
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro Santos, J
dc.date.accessioned2012-12-20T16:01:19Z
dc.date.available2012-12-20T16:01:19Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Prospective testing for posttransplant circulating anti-HLA antibodies seems to be a critical noninvasive tool, but confirmatory data are lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over the last 3 years, peritubular capillary (PTC) C4d deposition was prospectively sought by an immunofluorescence technique applied to frozen tissue in biopsies obtained for allograft dysfunction. Screening for circulating anti-HLA class I/II alloantibodies (AlloAb) by the flow cytometric test was performed simultaneously. RESULTS: We evaluated 132 sets of biopsies and simultaneous serum samples. PTC C4d deposition was demonstrated in 15.9% (21/132) of biopsies. Circulating anti-HLA I/II AlloAb were detected in 25% (33/132) of serum samples. Employing receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves for all C4d-positive biopsies, screening for AlloAb showed a global specificity of 82% and sensitivity of 61.9%. When this analysis was restricted to biopsies obtained in the first month posttransplantation, the sensitivity increased to 81.8%, but the specificity decreased to 76.9%. After the first month posttransplantation, we observed sensitivity of 40.0% and a specificity of 86.4%. In the first month posttransplantation, all patients with a diagnosis of acute antibody-mediated rejection displayed circulating anti-HLA class I/II, but not always at the same time as the C4d-positive biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: In the first month posttransplantation, prospective monitoring of anti-HLA antibodies may be useful. The high sensitivity allows the identification of patients at risk, affording an earlier diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection. After the first month, the test can be used to evaluate allograft dysfunction episodes, since positivity is highly suggestive of an antibody-mediated process.por
dc.identifier.citationTransplant Proc. 2009 Apr;41(3):859-61por
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/903
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.publisherElsevierpor
dc.subjectMarcadores Biológicospor
dc.subjectBiópsiapor
dc.subjectComplemento C4bpor
dc.subjectCitometria de Fluxopor
dc.subjectAntigénio HLApor
dc.subjectAntigénio HLA-Dpor
dc.subjectAntigénio de Histocompatibilidade Classe Ipor
dc.subjectTransplantação de Rimpor
dc.subjectFragmentos de Peptídeospor
dc.subjectReoperaçãopor
dc.subjectSensibilidade e Especificidadepor
dc.subjectTransplante Homólogopor
dc.titleSpecificity and Sensitivity of Screening for Anti-HLA Antibodies in Kidney Allograft Dysfunctionpor
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage861por
oaire.citation.startPage859por
oaire.citation.titleTransplantation Proceedingspor
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspor
rcaap.typearticlepor

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Transpl Proc 2009 859.pdf
Size:
103.92 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections