Browsing by Author "Chaves Loureiro, C"
Now showing 1 - 8 of 8
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Asthma App Use and Interest Among Patients With Asthma: A Multicenter StudyPublication . Jácome, C; Almeida, R; Pereira, AM; Araújo, L; Correia, MA; Pereira, M; Couto, M; Lopes, C; Chaves Loureiro, C; Catarata, MJ; Santos, LM; Ramos, B; Mendes, A; Pedro, E; Cidrais Rodrigues, JC; Oliveira, G; Aguiar, AP; Arrobas, AM; Costa, J; Dias, J; Todo Bom, A; Azevedo, J; Ribeiro, C; Alves, M; Pinto, PL; Neuparth, N; Palhinha, A; Marques, JG; Martins, P; Trincão, D; Neves, A; Todo Bom, F; Santos, M A; Branco, J; Loyoza, C; Costa, A; Silva Neto, A; Silva, D; Vasconcelos, MJ; Teixeira, MF; Ferreira-Magalhães, M; Taborda Barata, L; Carvalhal, C; Santos, N; Sofia Pinto, C; Rodrigues Alves, R; Moreira, AS; Morais Silva, P; Fernandes, R; Ferreira, R; Alves, C; Câmara, R; Ferraz de Oliveira, J; Bordalo, D; Calix, MJ; Marques, A; Nunes, C; Menezes, F; Gomes, R; Almeida Fonseca, J
- Feasibility and Acceptability of an Asthma App to Monitor Medication Adherence: Mixed Methods StudyPublication . Jácome, C; Almeida, R; Pereira, AM; Amaral, R; Mendes, S; Alves-Correia, M; Vidal, C; López Freire, S; Méndez Brea, P; Araújo, L; Couto, M; Antolín-Amérigo, D; de la Hoz Caballer, B; Barra Castro, A; Gonzalez-De-Olano, D; Todo Bom, A; Azevedo, J; Leiria Pinto, P; Pinto, N; Castro Neves, A; Palhinha, Ana; Todo Bom, F; Costa, A; Chaves Loureiro, C; Maia Santos, L; Arrobas, A; Valério, M; Cardoso, J; Emiliano, M; Gerardo, R; Cidrais Rodrigues, JC; Oliveira, G; Carvalho, J; Mendes, A; Lozoya, C; Santos, N; Menezes, F; Gomes, R; Câmara, R; Rodrigues Alves, R; Moreira, AS; Bordalo, D; Alves, C; Ferreira, JA; Lopes, C; Silva, D; Vasconcelos, MJ; Teixeira, MF; Ferreira-Magalhães, M; Taborda-Barata, L; Cálix, MJ; Alves, A; Almeida Fonseca, JBackground: Poor medication adherence is a major challenge in asthma, and objective assessment of inhaler adherence is needed. The InspirerMundi app aims to monitor adherence while providing a positive experience through gamification and social support. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the InspirerMundi app to monitor medication adherence in adolescents and adults with persistent asthma (treated with daily inhaled medication). Methods: A 1-month mixed method multicenter observational study was conducted in 26 secondary care centers from Portugal and Spain. During an initial face-to-face visit, physicians reported patients' asthma therapeutic plan in a structured questionnaire. During the visits, patients were invited to use the app daily to register their asthma medication intakes. A scheduled intake was considered taken when patients registered the intake (inhaler, blister, or other drug formulation) by using the image-based medication detection tool. At 1 month, patients were interviewed by phone, and app satisfaction was assessed on a 1 (low) to 5 (high) scale. Patients were also asked to point out the most and least preferred app features and make suggestions for future app improvements. Results: A total of 107 patients (median 27 [P25-P75 14-40] years) were invited, 92.5% (99/107) installed the app, and 73.8% (79/107) completed the 1-month interview. Patients interacted with the app a median of 9 (P25-P75 1-24) days. At least one medication was registered in the app by 78% (77/99) of patients. A total of 53% (52/99) of participants registered all prescribed inhalers, and 34% (34/99) registered the complete asthma therapeutic plan. Median medication adherence was 75% (P25-P75 25%-90%) for inhalers and 82% (P25-P75 50%-94%) for other drug formulations. Patients were globally satisfied with the app, with 75% (59/79) scoring ≥4,; adherence monitoring, symptom monitoring, and gamification features being the most highly scored components; and the medication detection tool among the lowest scored. A total of 53% (42/79) of the patients stated that the app had motivated them to improve adherence to inhaled medication and 77% (61/79) would recommend the app to other patients. Patient feedback was reflected in 4 major themes: medication-related features (67/79, 85%), gamification and social network (33/79, 42%), symptom monitoring and physician communication (21/79, 27%), and other aspects (16/79, 20%). Conclusions: The InspirerMundi app was feasible and acceptable to monitor medication adherence in patients with asthma. Based on patient feedback and to increase the registering of medications, the therapeutic plan registration and medication detection tool were redesigned. Our results highlight the importance of patient participation to produce a patient-centered and engaging mHealth asthma app.
- Monitoring Adherence to Asthma Inhalers Using the InspirerMundi App: Analysis of Real-World, Medium-Term Feasibility StudiesPublication . Jácome, C; Almeida, R; Pereira, AM; Amaral, R; Vieira-Marques, P; Mendes, S; Alves-Correia, M; Ferreira, JA; Lopes, I; Gomes, J; Araújo, L; Couto, M; Chaves Loureiro, C; Maia Santos, L; Arrobas, A; Valério, M; Todo Bom, A; Azevedo, J; Teixeira, MF; Ferreira-Magalhães, M; Leiria Pinto, P; Pinto, N; Castro Neves, A; Morête, A; Todo Bom, F; Costa, A; Silva, D; Vasconcelos, MJ; Falcão, H; Marques, ML; Mendes, A; Cardoso, J; Cidrais Rodrigues, JC; Oliveira, G; Carvalho, J; Lozoya, C; Santos, N; Menezes, F; Gomes, R; Câmara, R; Rodrigues Alves, R; Moreira, AS; Abreu, C; Silva, R; Bordalo, D; Alves, C; Lopes, C; Taborda-Barata, L; Fernandes, RM; Ferreira, R; Chaves-Loureiro, C; Cálix, MJ; Alves, A; Almeida Fonseca, JBackground: Poor medication adherence is a major challenge in asthma and objective assessment of inhaler adherence is needed. InspirerMundi app aims to monitor inhaler adherence while turning it into a positive experience through gamification and social support. Objective: We assessed the medium-term feasibility of the InspirerMundi app to monitor inhaler adherence in real-world patients with persistent asthma (treated with daily inhaled medication). In addition, we attempted to identify the characteristics of the patients related to higher app use. Methods: Two real-world multicenter observational studies, with one initial face-to-face visit and a 4-month telephone interview, were conducted in 29 secondary care centers from Portugal. During an initial face-to-face visit, patients were invited to use the app daily to register their asthma medication intakes. A scheduled intake was considered taken when patients took a photo of the medication (inhaler, blister, or others) using the image-based medication detection tool. Medication adherence was calculated as the number of doses taken as a percentage of the number scheduled. Interacting with the app ≥30 days was used as the cut-off for higher app use. Results: A total of 114 patients {median 20 [percentile 25 to percentile 75 (P25-P75) 16-36] years, 62% adults} were invited, 107 (94%) installed the app and 83 (73%) completed the 4-month interview. Patients interacted with the app for a median of 18 [3-45] days, translated on a median use rate of 15 [3-38]%. Median inhaler adherence assessed through the app was 34 [4-73]% when considering all scheduled inhalations for the study period. Inhaler adherence assessed was not significantly correlated with self-reported estimates. Median adherence for oral and other medication was 41 [6-83]% and 43 [3-73]%, respectively. Patients with higher app use were slightly older (p = 0.012), more frequently taking medication for other health conditions (p = 0.040), and more frequently prescribed long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA, p = 0.024). After 4 months, Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test (CARAT) scores improved (p < 0.001), but no differences between patients interacting with the app for 30 days or less were seen. Conclusions: The InspirerMundi app was feasible to monitor inhaler adherence in patients with persistent asthma. The persistent use of this mHealth technology varies widely. A better understanding of characteristics related to higher app use is still needed before effectiveness studies are undertaken.
- Patient-Physician Discordance in Assessment of Adherence to Inhaled Controller Medication: a Cross-Sectional Analysis of Two CohortsPublication . Jácome, C; Pereira, AM; Almeida, R; Ferreira-Magalhaes, M; Couto, M; Araujo, L; Pereira, M; Alves Correia, M; Chaves Loureiro, C; Catarata, MJ; Maia Santos, L; Pereira, J; Ramos, B; Lopes, C; Mendes, A; Cidrais Rodrigues, JC; Oliveira, G; Aguiar, AP; Afonso, I; Carvalho, J; Arrobas, A; Coutinho Costa, J; Dias, J; Todo Bom, A; Azevedo, J; Ribeiro, C; Alves, M; Leiria Pinto, P; Neuparth, N; Palhinha, A; Gaspar Marques, J; Pinto, N; Martins, P; Todo Bom, F; Alvarenga Santos, M; Gomes Costa, A; Silva Neto, A; Santalha, M; Lozoya, C; Santos, N; Silva, D; Vasconcelos, MJ; Taborda-Barata, L; Carvalhal, C; Teixeira, MF; Rodrigues Alves, R; Moreira, AS; Sofia Pinto, C; Morais Silva, P; Alves, C; Câmara, R; Coelho, D; Bordalo, D; Fernandes, R; Ferreira, R; Menezes, F; Gomes, R; Calix, MJ; Marques, A; Cardoso, J; Emiliano, M; Gerardo, R; Nunes, C; Câmara, R; Ferreira, JA; Carvalho, A; Freitas, P; Correia, R; Fonseca, JOBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare patient's and physician's ratings of inhaled medication adherence and to identify predictors of patient-physician discordance. DESIGN: Baseline data from two prospective multicentre observational studies. SETTING: 29 allergy, pulmonology and paediatric secondary care outpatient clinics in Portugal. PARTICIPANTS: 395 patients (≥13 years old) with persistent asthma. MEASURES: Data on demographics, patient-physician relationship, upper airway control, asthma control, asthma treatment, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and healthcare use were collected. Patients and physicians independently assessed adherence to inhaled controller medication during the previous week using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Discordance was defined as classification in distinct VAS categories (low 0-50; medium 51-80; high 81-100) or as an absolute difference in VAS scores ≥10 mm. Correlation between patients' and physicians' VAS scores/categories was explored. A multinomial logistic regression identified the predictors of physician overestimation and underestimation. RESULTS: High inhaler adherence was reported both by patients (median (percentile 25 to percentile 75) 85 (65-95) mm; 53% VAS>80) and by physicians (84 (68-95) mm; 53% VAS>80). Correlation between patient and physician VAS scores was moderate (rs=0.580; p<0.001). Discordance occurred in 56% of cases: in 28% physicians overestimated adherence and in 27% underestimated. Low adherence as assessed by the physician (OR=27.35 (9.85 to 75.95)), FEV1 ≥80% (OR=2.59 (1.08 to 6.20)) and a first appointment (OR=5.63 (1.24 to 25.56)) were predictors of underestimation. An uncontrolled asthma (OR=2.33 (1.25 to 4.34)), uncontrolled upper airway disease (OR=2.86 (1.35 to 6.04)) and prescription of short-acting beta-agonists alone (OR=3.05 (1.15 to 8.08)) were associated with overestimation. Medium adherence as assessed by the physician was significantly associated with higher risk of discordance, both for overestimation and underestimation of adherence (OR=14.50 (6.04 to 34.81); OR=2.21 (1.07 to 4.58)), while having a written action plan decreased the likelihood of discordance (OR=0.25 (0.12 to 0.52); OR=0.41 (0.22 to 0.78)) (R2=44%). CONCLUSION: Although both patients and physicians report high inhaler adherence, discordance occurred in half of cases. Implementation of objective adherence measures and effective communication are needed to improve patient-physician agreement.
- Reducing Oral Corticosteroids in Severe Asthma (ROSA Project): a Nationwide Portuguese ConsensusPublication . Chaves Loureiro, C; Branco Ferreira, M; Ferreira, J; Lima, R; Marques, J; Sokolova, A; Tonin, F; Duarte Ramos, FIntroduction and objectives: We aimed to build a national consensus to optimize the use of oral corticosteroids (OCS) in severe asthma in Portugal. Material and methods: A modified 3-round Delphi including 65 statements (topics on chronic systemic corticotherapy, therapeutic schemes, asthma safety and monitoring) was performed via online platform (October-November 2019). A five-point Likert-type scale was used (1-'strongly disagree'; 5-'strongly agree'). Consensus threshold was established as a percentage of agreement among participants ≥90% in the 1st round and ≥85% in the 2nd and 3rd rounds. The level of consensus achieved by the panel was discussed with the participants (face-to-face meeting). Results: Forty-eight expert physicians in severe asthma (specialists in allergology and pulmonology) participated in the study. Almost half of the statements (28/65; 43.1%) obtained positive consensus by the end of round one. By the end of the exercise, 12 (18.5%) statements did not achieve consensus. Overall, 87% of physicians agree that further actions for OCS cumulative risk assessment in acute asthma exacerbations are needed. The vast majority (91.7%) demonstrated a favorable perception for using biological agents whenever patients are eligible. Most participants (95.8%) are more willing to accept some degree of lung function deterioration compared to other outcomes (worsening of symptoms, quality of life) when reducing OCS dose. Monitoring patients' comorbidities was rated as imperative by all experts. Conclusions: These results can guide an update on asthma management in Portugal and should be supplemented by studies on therapy access, patients' adherence, and costs.
- Severe Asthma in the Era of COVID-19: A Narrative ReviewPublication . Gaspar-Marques, J; van Zeller, M; Carreiro-Martins, P; Chaves Loureiro, CIntroduction and objectives: Severe asthma management during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is a challenge and will continue to be, at least in the next few months, as herd immunity is still a mirage. A lot has to be learned about how COVID-19 affects underlying diseases, and severe asthma is no exception. Methods: Narrative review of papers available until February 2021 in PubMed and Google Scholar, relating severe asthma and COVID-19. Four main research topics were reviewed: SARS-CoV-2 infection: immunology and respiratory pathology; interrelationship of severe asthma endotypes and COVID-19 disease mechanisms; severe asthma epidemiology and COVID-19; and biologics for severe asthma in the context of COVID-19. Results: COVID-19 disease mechanisms start with upper respiratory cell infection, and afterwards several immunological facets are activated, contributing to disease severity, namely cell-mediated immunity and antibody production. Although infrequent in the COVID-19 course some patients develop a cytokine storm that causes organ damage and may lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome or multiorgan failure. Regarding severe asthma endotypes, type2-high might have a protective role both in infection risk and disease course. There is conflicting data regarding the epidemiological relationship between COVID-19 among severe asthma patients, with some studies reporting increased risk of infection and disease course, whereas others the other way round. Biologics for severe asthma do not seem to increase the risk of infection and severe COVID-19, although further evidence is needed. Conclusions: Globally, in the era of COVID-19, major respiratory societies recommend continuing the biologic treatment, preferably in a self-home administration program.
- The Portuguese Severe Asthma Registry: Development, Features, and Data Sharing PoliciesPublication . Sá-Sousa, A; Fonseca, JA; Pereira, AM; Ferreira, A; Arrobas, A; Mendes, A; Drummond, M; Videira, W; Costa, T; Farinha, P; Soares, J; Rocha, P; Todo-Bom, A; Sokolova, A; Costa, A; Fernandes, B; Chaves Loureiro, C; Longo, C; Pardal, C; Costa, C; Cruz, C; Loureiro, CC; Lopes, C; Mesquita, D; Faria, E; Magalhães, E; Menezes, F; Todo-Bom, F; Carvalho, F; Regateiro, FS; Falcão, H; Fernandes, I; Gaspar-Marques, J; Viana, J; Ferreira, J; Silva, JM; Simão, L; Almeida, L; Fernandes, L; Ferreira, L; van Zeller, M; Quaresma, M; Castanho, M; André, N; Cortesão, N; Leiria-Pinto, P; Pinto, P; Rosa, P; Carreiro-Martins, P; Gerardo, R; Silva, R; Lucas, S; Almeida, T; Calvo, TThe Portuguese Severe Asthma Registry (Registo de Asma Grave Portugal, RAG) was developed by an open collaborative network of asthma specialists. RAG collects data from adults and pediatric severe asthma patients that despite treatment optimization and adequate management of comorbidities require step 4/5 treatment according to GINA recommendations. In this paper, we describe the development and implementation of RAG, its features, and data sharing policies. The contents and structure of RAG were defined in a multistep consensus process. A pilot version was pretested and iteratively improved. The selection of data elements for RAG considered other severe asthma registries, aiming at characterizing the patient's clinical status whilst avoiding overloading the standard workflow of the clinical appointment. Features of RAG include automatic assessment of eligibility, easy data input, and exportable data in natural language that can be pasted directly in patients' electronic health record and security features to enable data sharing (among researchers and with other international databases) without compromising patients' confidentiality. RAG is a national web-based disease registry of severe asthma patients, available at asmagrave.pt. It allows prospective clinical data collection, promotes standardized care and collaborative clinical research, and may contribute to inform evidence-based healthcare policies for severe asthma.
- Validation of App and Phone Versions of the Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test (CARAT)Publication . Jácome, C; Pereira, AM; Almeida, R; Amaral, R; Correia, MA; Mendes, S; Vieira-Marques, P; Ferreira, JA; Lopes, I; Gomes, J; Vidal, C; López Freire, S; Méndez Brea, P; Arrobas, A; Valério, M; Chaves Loureiro, C; Santos, LM; Couto, M; Araujo, L; Todo Bom, A; Azevedo, JP; Cardoso, J; Emiliano, M; Gerardo, R; Lozoya, C; Pinto, PL; Castro Neves, A; Pinto, N; Palhinha, A; Teixeira, F; Ferreira-Magalhães, M; Alves, C; Coelho, D; Santos, N; Menezes, F; Gomes, R; Cidrais Rodrigues, JC; Oliveira, G; Carvalho, J; Rodrigues Alves, R; Moreira, AS; Costa, A; Abreu, C; Silva, R; Morête, A; Falcão, H; Marques, ML; Câmara, R; Cálix, MJ; Bordalo, D; Silva, D; Vasconcelos, MJ; Fernandes, RM; Ferreira, R; Freitas, P; Lopes, F; Almeida Fonseca, J