Browsing by Author "Cocco Martins, C"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Angiossarcoma do BaçoPublication . Sousa, C; Martins, I; Gonçalves, M; Cocco Martins, C; Carvalho, ROs tumores primitivos do baço são extremamente raros. Descrevemos o 1° caso dos Hospitais Civis de Lisboa, em S. José, numa mulher de 70 anos que apresentava espleno egália. Havia história anterior de irradiação pélvica. A ressonância magnética esclareceu a presença de massa tumoral e a angiografia caracterizou-a como vascular. A doente está bem um ano após esplenectomia. Encontrámos na literatura a descrição de 61 casos deste tumor de etiopatogenia não esclarecida. A esplenectomia precoce deve ser a primeira abordagem terapêutica pelo risco de ruptura. Esta foi a forma de apresentação em 34° o dos casos da série de Autry et al. Por se tratar de um tumor tão raro, não há estudos sobre a eficácia da quimioterapia, mas nas formas disseminadas podem utilizar-se esquemas de tratamentos citostáticos activos em sarcomas de partes moles.
- The Oncological and Functional Risks of the Organ Preservation Experimental Treatment ApproachPublication . Cocco Martins, CWe increasingly face conservative surgery for rectal cancer and even the so called ‘wait and see’ approach, as far as 10–20% patients can reach a complete pathological response at the time of surgery. But what can we say to our patients about risks? Standard surgery with mesorectal excision gives a <2% local recurrence with a post operative death rate of 2–8% (may reach 30% at 6 months in those over 85), but low AR has some deterioration in bowel function and in low cancer a permanent stoma may be required. Also a long-term impact on urinary and sexual function is possible. Distant metastasis rate seem to be identical in the standard and conservative approach. It is difficult to evaluate conservative approach because a not clear standardization of surgery for low rectal cancer. Rullier et al tried to clarify, and they found identical results for recurrence (5–9%), disease free survival (70%) at 5y for coloanal anastomosis and intersphinteric resection. Other series have found local recurrence higher than with standard approach and functional results may be worse and, in some situations, salvage therapy is compromised or has more complications. In this context, functional outcomes are very important but most studies are incomplete in measuring bowel function in the context of conservative approach. In 2005 Temple et al made a survey of 122/184 patient after sphinter preserving surgery and found a 96.9% of incomplete evacuation, 94.4% clustering, 93.2% food affecting frequency, 91.8% gas incontinence and proposed a systematic evaluation with a specific questionnaire. In which concerns ‘Wait and see’ approach for complete clinical responders, it was first advocated by Habr Gama for tumors up to 7cm, with a low locoregional failure of 4.6%, 5y overall survival 96%, 72% for disease free survival; one fifth of patients failed in the first year; a Dutch trial had identical results but others had worse recurrence rates; in other series 25% of patients could not be salvaged even with APR; 30% have subsequent metastatic disease what seems equal for ‘wait and see’ and operated patients. In a recent review Glynne Jones considers that all the evaluated ‘wait and see’ studies are heterogeneous in staging, inclusion criteria, design and follow up after chemoradiation and that there is the suggestion that patients who progress while under observation fare worse than those resected. He proposes long-term observational studies with more uniform inclusion criteria. We are now facing a moment where we may be more aggressive in early cancer and neoadjuvant treatment to be more conservative in the subsequent treatment but we need a better stratification of patients, better evaluation of results and more clear prognostic markers.
- Uveíte, Sífilis e SIDAPublication . Sousa, C; Alves, P; Pinto Ferreira, A; Cocco Martins, C; Vital Morgado, AOs autores apresentam o caso clínico de um homem de 55 anos com antecedentes de sífilis primária na juventude e quatro reinfecções posteriores, a última das quais há dois anos, adequadamente tratada e com remissão do quadro. Observado em consulta externa de Oftalmologia, por olho vermelho, foi-lhe diagnosticada pan-uveíte, com íris de características sifilíticas (roséola sifilítica). Na sua avaliação laboratorial salientaram-se: Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) positivo, Fluorescent Treponemal Antibody Absorbed Test (FTA-ABS) positivo, Vírus da Imunodeficiência Humana (VIH-1) positivo. Internado no Serviço de Medicina, foi submetido a punção lombar, tendo a análise do liquor revelado pleocitose, proteinorraquia aumentada, VDRL negativo, Treponema Pallidum Hemagglutination Assay (TPHA) positivo e FTA/ABS positivo, aspectos estes compatíveis com envolvimento sifilítico do SNC. O diagnóstico de neurosífilis assintomática nos doentes duplamente infectados é difícil e complexo, pois fundamenta-se em testes serológicos que não obedecem ao padrão habitual. A terapêutica é controversa, devido à recorrência dos quadros neurológicos após terapêuticas consideradas adequadas, sendo recomendada vigilância apertada destes doentes.