Browsing by Author "Costa Martins, JM"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Effects of Local Anesthetic on the Time Between Analgesic Boluses and the Duration of Labor in Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia: Prospective Study of Two Ultra-Low Dose Regimens of Ropivacaine and SufentanilPublication . Costa Martins, JM; Dias, CC; Pereira, M; Tavares, JBACKGROUND: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia with low concentrations of anesthetics is effective in reducing labor pain. The aim of this study was to assess and compare two ultra-low dose regimens of ropivacaine and sufentanil (0.1% ropivacaine plus 0.5 μg.ml-1 sufentanil vs. 0.06% ropivacaine plus 0.5 μg.ml-1 sufentanil) on the intervals between boluses and the duration of labor. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this non-randomized prospective study, conducted between January and July 2010, two groups of parturients received patient-controlled epidural analgesia: Group I (n = 58; 1 mg.ml-1 ropivacaine + 0.5 μg.ml-1 sufentanil) and Group II (n = 57; 0.6 mg.ml-1 ropivacaine + 0.5 μg.ml-1 sufentanil). Rescue doses of ropivacaine at the concentration of the assigned group without sufentanil were administered as necessary. Pain, local anesthetic requirements, neuraxial blockade characteristics, labor and neonatal outcomes, and maternal satisfaction were recorded. RESULTS: The ropivacaine dose was greater in Group I (9.5 [7.7-12.7] mg.h-1 vs. 6.1 [5.1-9.8 mg.h-1], p < 0.001). A time increase between each bolus was observed in Group I (beta = 32.61 min, 95% CI [25.39; 39.82], p < 0.001), whereas a time decrease was observed in Group II (beta = -1.40 min, 95% CI [-2.44; -0.36], p = 0.009). The duration of the second stage of labor in Group I was significantly longer than that in Group II (78 min vs. 65 min, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Parturients receiving 0.06% ropivacaine exhibited less evidence of cumulative effects and exhibited faster second stage progression than those who received 0.1% ropivacaine.
- Síndrome da Cauda Equina em Anestesia Obstétrica: Caso, Factos e CausasPublication . Duarte, C; Marques, R; Costa Martins, JMIntrodução: A incidência de síndrome da cauda equina foi quantificada em <0,23: 10 000 na anestesia obstétrica. Apesar da raridade, as suas consequências podem ser geradoras de limitações importantes na qualidade de vida das pacientes, daí a pertinência da análise deste caso clínico. Grávida de 34 anos com antecedentes de VIH2, VHC e linfoma não Hodgkin em remissão desde há 5 anos submetida a bloqueio subaracnoideu e colocação de cateter epidural para cesariana. A abordagem do espaço epidural foi difícil. Administrou-se 7,5mg de levobupivacaína e 0,0025mg sufentanil no espaço subaracnoideu e a paciente queixou-se de dor tipo choques eléctricos e parestesias nos membros inferiores durante segundos. Após 1:30h, na UCPA, a paciente iniciou o mesmo tipo de dor na região sacrococcígea e coxas após administração morfina e metilprednisolona no espaço epidural, a qual foi debelada com paracetamol, cetorolac, dipirona e petidina. A remoção do cateter epidural foi difícil. No pós-operatório a paciente sentiu tremor ao nível da coxa esquerda e parestesias na coxa direita. Pela raridade do síndrome da cauda equina, a análise do ocorrido é pertinente contrapondo com descrições prévias, em virtude duma intervenção anestésica mais segura.
- Women's Attachment as a Predictor of Pain During Labour and Post-Delivery: a Prospective Observational StudyPublication . Costa Martins, JM; Fernandes da Silva, C; Pereira, M; Martins, H; Oliveira, C; Puga, A; Coelho, R; Tavares, JINTRODUCTION: Labour is considered to be one of the most painful and significant experiences in a woman's life. The aim of this study was to examine whether women's attachment style is a predictor of the pain experienced throughout labour and post-delivery. MATERIAL AND METHODS:Thirty-two pregnant women were assessed during the third trimester of pregnancy and during labour. Adult attachment was assessed with the Adult Attachment Scale ' Revised. The perceived intensity of labour pain was measured using a visual analogue scale for pain in the early stage of labour, throughout labour and post-delivery. RESULTS:Women with an insecure attachment style reported more pain at 3 cm of cervical dilatation (p < 0.05), before the administration of analgesia (p < 0.01) and post-delivery (p < 0.05) than those securely attached. In multivariate models, attachment style was a significant predictor of labour pain at 3 cm of cervical dilatation and before the first administration of analgesia but not of the perceived pain post-delivery. DISCUSSION: These findings confirm that labour pain is influenced by relevant psychological factors and suggest that a woman's attachment style may be a risk factor for greater pain during labour. CONCLUSION:Future studies in the context of obstetric pain may consider the attachment style as an indicator of individual differences in the pain response during labour. This may have important implications in anaesthesiology and to promote a relevant shift in institutional practices and therapeutic procedures.