Browsing by Author "Dinis-Ribeiro, M"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Management of Colorectal Laterally Spreading Tumors: a Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisPublication . Russo, P; Barbeiro, S; Awadie, H; Libânio, D; Dinis-Ribeiro, M; Bourke, MObjective and study aims To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different endoscopic resection techniques for laterally spreading colorectal tumors (LST). Methods Relevant studies were identified in three electronic databases (PubMed, ISI and Cochrane Central Register). We considered all clinical studies in which colorectal LST were treated with endoscopic resection (endoscopic mucosal resection [EMR] and/or endoscopic submucosal dissection [ESD]) and/or transanal minimally invasive surgery (TEMS). Rates of en-bloc/piecemeal resection, complete endoscopic resection, R0 resection, curative resection, adverse events (AEs) or recurrence, were extracted. Study quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and a meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Results Forty-nine studies were included. Complete resection was similar between techniques (EMR 99.5 % [95 % CI 98.6 %-100 %] vs. ESD 97.9 % [95 % CI 96.1 - 99.2 %]), being curative in 1685/1895 (13 studies, pooled curative resection 90 %, 95 % CI 86.6 - 92.9 %, I 2 = 79 %) with non-significantly higher curative resection rates with ESD (93.6 %, 95 % CI 91.3 - 95.5 %, vs. 84 % 95 % CI 78.1 - 89.3 % with EMR). ESD was also associated with a significantly higher perforation risk (pooled incidence 5.9 %, 95 % CI 4.3 - 7.9 %, vs. EMR 1.2 %, 95 % CI 0.5 - 2.3 %) while bleeding was significantly more frequent with EMR (9.6 %, 95 % CI 6.5 - 13.2 %; vs. ESD 2.8 %, 95 % CI 1.9 - 4.0 %). Procedure-related mortality was 0.1 %. Recurrence occurred in 5.5 %, more often with EMR (12.6 %, 95 % CI 9.1 - 16.6 % vs. ESD 1.1 %, 95 % CI 0.3 - 2.5 %), with most amenable to successful endoscopic treatment (87.7 %, 95 % CI 81.1 - 93.1 %). Surgery was limited to 2.7 % of the lesions, 0.5 % due to AEs. No data of TEMS were available for LST. Conclusions EMR and ESD are both effective and safe and are associated with a very low risk of procedure related mortality.
- Recomendações para o Diagnóstico e Tratamento do Adenocarcinoma Gástrico (Grupo de Investigação de Cancro Digestivo)Publication . Brito, D; Raimundo, A; Sousa, O; Pereira, H; Ribau, E; Afonso, LP; Cabral, S; Dinis-Ribeiro, M; Nogueira, C; Barroso, S; Bettencourt, A; Gíria, J; Ferrão, H; Penedo, J; Cartucho, D; Caravana, J; Fradique, AC; Guerra, JP; Guimarães, J; Sousa, F; Henrique, R; Jácome, M; Fragoso, M; Vaz, P; Corso, G; Quintanilha, R; Costa, P; Santos, LL
- Risk Factors for Bleeding After Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: a Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisPublication . Libânio, D; Nuno Costa, M; Pimentel-Nunes, P; Dinis-Ribeiro, MBACKGROUND AND AIMS: Postprocedural bleeding (PPB) is the most common adverse event associated with endoscopic resection. Several studies have tried to identify risk factors for PPB after gastric EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), with controversial results. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify significant risk factors for PPB after gastric EMR and ESD. METHODS: Three online databases were searched. Pooled odds ratio (OR) was computed for each risk factor using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed by Cochran's Q test and I(2). RESULTS: Seventy-four articles were included. Pooled PPB rate was 5.1% (95% confidence interval, 4.5%-5.7%), which did not vary according to different study designs. Male sex (OR, 1.25), cardiopathy (OR, 1.54), antithrombotic drugs (OR, 1.63), cirrhosis (OR, 1.76), chronic kidney disease (OR, 3.38), tumor size > 20 mm (OR, 2.70), resected specimen size > 30 mm (OR, 2.85), localization in the lesser curvature (OR, 1.74), flat/depressed morphology (OR, 1.43), carcinoma histology (OR, 1.46), and ulceration (OR, 1.64) were identified as significant risk factors for PPB, whereas age, hypertension, submucosal invasion, fibrosis, and localization (upper, middle, or lower third) were not. Procedure duration > 60 minutes (OR, 2.05) and the use of histamine-2 receptor antagonists instead of proton pump inhibitors (OR, 2.13) were the procedural factors associated with PPB, whereas endoscopist experience and preprocedural proton pump inhibitors were not. Second-look endoscopy was not associated with decreased PPB (OR, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, .85-2.12). CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for PPB were identified that can help to guide management after gastric ESD, namely adjusting further management. Second-look endoscopy is not associated with decreased PPB.
- A Truly Visible Vessel in an Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Scare: Thinking Outside RecommendationsPublication . Costa, MN; Libânio, D; Lage, J; Dinis-Ribeiro, M; Pimentel-Nunes, P