Browsing by Author "Duarte, B"
Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Adult Tinea Capitis and Tinea Barbae in a Tertiary Portuguese Hospital: a 11-Year AuditPublication . Duarte, B; Galhardas, C; Cabete, JAdult tinea capitis and tinea barbae are nowadays considered uncommon in developed countries. Despite their potential for morbidity and healthcare costs, few series have attempted to characterise these infectious disorders. We conducted a cross-sectional study to analyse the epidemiological, clinical and mycological characteristics of adult tinea capitis and tinea barbae of a large tertiary centre in Southern Europe. All adult patients with a mycological-confirmed tinea capitis or barbae over a 11-year period (January 2008 to December 2018) were considered for the analysis. Concerning tinea capitis, 860 culture-confirmed diagnoses were made during this 11-year period, of which only 15 (1.5%) occurred in adults (15 patients). A disproportionately high number of patients were female and immunocompromised. Microsporum audouinii (20%) and Trichophyton rubrum (20%) were the most common isolates. Half of the cases were initially misdiagnosed. Regarding tinea barbae, 7 cases were diagnosed over this time period. Overuse of topical steroids was widespread in this population. Trichophyton rubrum was the infectious agent in all cases. Initial misdiagnosis was very common (43%). Adult tinea capitis and tinea barbae can still be observed in contemporary practice and remain a public health concern, with the immunosuppressed patient being particularly affected. Initial misdiagnosis is a common occurrence. Anthropophilic fungi are now the most common aetiologic agents of these infections, and they will probably continue to do so as the large urban centres expand peripherally. Awareness for this diagnosis is necessary to prevent unwarranted morbidity and costs.
- Dakin's Solution in the Treatment of Severe Diabetic Foot InfectionsPublication . Duarte, B; Formiga, A; Neves, JAcute necrotising diabetic foot (DF) infections are common, costly, and do not infrequently result in debilitating major lower-extremity amputations. Dakin's solution is a long-standing topical antiseptic that has shown benefit in this clinical setting, but its use is undermined by a presumed risk of cytotoxicity. In this single-centre case series, we retrospectively evaluated 24 patients with severe necrotising DF infections treated with a cyclical instillation of Dakin's solution at a referral multidisciplinary DF unit. Most patients achieved favourable outcomes in infection control and limb salvage, with only one patient (4.2%) requiring a major (at or above-the-ankle) amputation. The mean time to complete or near-complete wound granulation was 5.4 weeks. Of the 12 patients who completed 12 or more months of longitudinal follow up, only 2 (12.2%) had a wound recurrence. In this severe DF infection patient cohort, Dakin's solution led to a clinically meaningful improvement. No remarkable impairment in the wound-healing process was observed.
- Dakin's Solution: Is There a Place for it in the 21st Century?Publication . Duarte, B; Cabete, J; Formiga, A; Neves, JDakin's solution (DS) is a time-honoured antiseptic that still remains part of the wound care armamentarium. In spite of its cytotoxicity, some question its use in the current era. We report the case of a 52-year-old diabetic woman who was admitted for sepsis because of a severely infected diabetic foot. Urgent surgical drainage and debridement left a 9 × 9-cm deep, complex, infected wound with both bone and tendon involvement. Treatment with local negative pressure was unsuccessful. DS was regularly instilled through a tube left in the wound dressing. A marked improvement was observed with this strategy as the wound bed was much cleaner and fully granulated after 6 weeks. No adverse effects were noted. This case debunks the myth that topical antiseptics necessarily impair wound healing. DS can still be considered an option for difficult-to-treat, complex and heavily infected wounds.
- Diabetic Foot Infection: Causative Pathogens and Empiric Antibiotherapy Considerations-The Experience of a Tertiary CenterPublication . Neves, JM; Duarte, B; Pinto, M; Formiga, A; Neves, JMost moderate-to-severe diabetic foot infections (DFIs) require hospitalization with urgent surgical approach and administration of empiric antibiotherapy. To ensure optimal antibiotic coverage, regular microbiological background updates are imperative. The purpose is to characterize the microbiological profile and the antibiotic sensitivity pattern of the DFI causative pathogens isolated within a specialized DFI unit of a tertiary hospital, in order to establish evidence-based policies regarding empirical antibiotic use. A cross-sectional study was conducted. Microbiological cultures and corresponding antibiotic sensitivity tests collected from moderate-to-severe DFIs as a first approach to the hospitalized patient were retrieved and analyzed during a 12-month period. Two groups were analyzed: inpatients that had been previously followed at the diabetic foot clinic of the hospital and inpatients without a previous contact with the hospital services. A total of 125 isolates obtained from 87 patients were deemed for analysis. Globally, a predominance of Gram-positive bacteria was observed (60%). Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen. The global ratio of methicillin-sensitive S aureus to methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA) was 1.3:1, with similar findings in both groups. According to the antibiotic sensitivity test results, and within the recommended empiric antibiotic regimens for DFI, piperacillin/tazobactam seems to be the most suitable option. Gram-positive bacteria prevail as the main isolates in DFIs. Screening for MRSA-specific risk factors is mandatory. When going for a first empiric therapy, piperacillin/tazobactam is recommended in this institution, and an anti-MRSA agent should be added early, if necessary. We encourage continuous monitoring for the bacterial prevalence in Portuguese diabetic foot centers as it is paramount for the decision making regarding DFI protocols.
- Limbic Encephalitis When the Immune Response Is the Hidden ProblemPublication . Amaral, M; Ferrão, J; Duarte, B; Pinheiro, SLimbic Encephalitis (LE) defined as a rare and frequently underrecognized immunomediated syndrome, presents with a constellation of unspecific behavioral and neuropsychiatric symptoms, developing over weeks to months. Personality disturbance, complex partial mesotemporal seizures and a subacute severe impairment of short-term memory are the cardinal symptoms, reflecting the involvement of the grand lobe limbique. The etiology is still poorly understood. Until recently, paraneoplastic etiology was thought to be the most common cause of LE, often preceding the malignancy identification (60%–75%). In the last decade other associations have been considered, namely infectious or autoimmune diseases. It appears that non-paraneoplastic LE (unassociated with onconeural antibodies) is at least 5 times more frequent than the one where paraneoplastic antibodies are detected, even excluding the cases of paraneoplastic LE that are antibody-negative (40%). To date, co-occurrence of two possible etiologies of this rare syndrome, in the same patient, has never been reported.
- Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria in Diabetic Foot Infections: Experience from a Portuguese Tertiary CentrePublication . Pessoa E Costa, T; Duarte, B; João, AL; Coelho, M; Formiga, A; Pinto, M; Neves, JIn recent years, the emergence of antibiotic resistant pathogens made increasingly difficult to establish appropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy protocols for acute diabetic foot infection (DFI) treatment. Early recognition of the population at-risk for multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infection is of paramount importance in order to decrease large-spectrum antibiotic overuse. This study used retrospective cohort study in a multidisciplinary tertiary diabetic foot unit. Patients with severe DFI were included and divided according to their infection resistance profile (susceptible vs MDR bacteria). Data regarding their comorbidities and length of hospital stay were collected. The primary endpoint was to determine the risk factors for MDR infections and to evaluate if these were associated with an increased length of stay (LOS). A total of 112 microbial isolates were included. Predominance of Gram-positive bacteria was observed and 22.3% of isolated bacteria were MDR. Previous hospitalisation was associated with a higher likelihood of MDR infection. MDR bacterial infection was also associated with an increased LOS (P = .0296). Our study showed a high incidence of MDR bacteria in patients with a DFI, especially in those who had a recent hospitalisation. MDR infections were associated with a prolonged LOS and represent a global public health issue for which emergent measures are needed.
- Predicting Incomplete Basal Cell Carcinoma Excisions - a Large Multidisciplinary Retrospective Analysis in a Tertiary CenterPublication . Duarte, B; Vieira, L; Pessoa e Costa, T; Ribeiro, L; João, A; Cabete, J; Varanda Pereira, AIntroduction: Surgical treatment of basal cell carcinomas is often performed by physicians with different surgical backgrounds. Collecting data from different surgical departments would better reflect their real-life surgical management.Objectives: To identify the rate, recurrence risk, and predictive factors accordingly to their relative contribution for an incomplete basal cell carcinoma excision in a large multidisciplinary real-life settingMethods: Retrospective cohort study of 2305 surgically treated lesions in different departments of a tertiary center.Results: There was a rate of incomplete excisions (15%) and a recurrence rate (35.5% vs. 6.8% in incomplete vs. complete excisions (p < .001)). A third of incompletely excised basal cell carcinoma (BCC) will recur over time. Stratified by relevancy, high-risk histological subtypes (micronodular (OR 5.10 - p < .001) and morpheaform (OR 5.42 - p < .001), smaller specimen sizes ( <0.5 cm or 0.5-1 cm, OR 3.99 and 2.49, respectively, p < .001) high-risk locations (OR 3.06 on the nose, OR 2.77 on the eyelids, p < .001), and recurrent BCCs (OR 1.72, p < .001). are the best predictors of an incomplete excision.Conclusions: Acknowledging the rate, recurrence risk and predictive factors for incomplete excisions may be beneficial for optimal preoperative planning and to prevent unwarranted re-interventions, morbidity, and healthcare costs.