Repository logo

Browsing by Author "Silva, B"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Cateter Ciático Popliteu: Uma Aposta Segura?
    Publication . Silva, B; Pinto, N; Ferreira, T
    O bloqueio contínuo de nervos periféricos (BCNP), descrito inicialmente em 1946 (1), consiste na colocação e utilização de um cateter percutâneo adjacente a um ou vários nervos periféricos para administração de anestésico local. A utilização de cateteres perineurais permite prologar a analgesia associada a técnica single shot, que dura, habitualmente, 24 horas. Apesar de bem estudado para analgesia no pos-operatório, o BCNP tem actualmente várias indicações descritas como tratamento de soluços(2), de vasospasmo associado a Doença de Raynaud (3), simpaticectomia e vasodilatação após cirurgia vascular (4), reimplantação de membros amputados(5), analgesia em trauma(6) e tratamento de dor cronica (7). Apesar de estar provado que no tratamento da dor pós-operatória o uso de cateteres perineurais permite uma analgesia mais eficaz comparativamente a analgesia com opióides sistémicos (reduzindo assim a incidência de complicações associadas ao uso destes) (8) e que melhora, a curto prazo, outcomes funcionais após cirurgia da extremidade, não esta evidenciado o beneficio desta técnica regional a longo prazo (9,10,11). Considerando a eficácia da técnica loco-regional para o tratamento da dor neuropática associada a doença arterial periférica (12,13) e a segurança associada ao bloqueio de nervo periférico (8,9,10,11), relata-se um caso de utilização desta técnica num doente para tratamento da agudização de dor crónica secundária a um agravamento da isquémia do membro inferior.
    2013Journal article Open access Show more
  • Impact of Routine Fractional Flow Reserve on Management Decision and 1-Year Clinical Outcome of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: PRIME-FFR (Insights From the POST-IT [Portuguese Study on the Evaluation of FFR-Guided Treatment of Coronary Disease] and R3F [French FFR Registry] Integrated Multicenter Registries - Implementation of FFR [Fractional Flow Reserve] in Routine Practice)
    Publication . Van Belle, E; Bravo Baptista, S; Raposo, L; Henderson, J; Rioufol, G; Santos, L; Pouillot, C; Ramos, R; Cuisset, T; Calé, R; Teiger, E; Jorge, E; Belle, L; Machado, C; Barreau, D; Costa, M; Hanssen, M; Oliveira, E; Besnard, C; Costa, J; Dallongeville, J; Pipa, J; Sideris, G; Fonseca, N; Bretelle, C; Guardado, J; Lhoest, N; Silva, B; Barnay, P; Sousa, MJ; Leborgne, L; Silva, JC; Vincent, F; Rodrigues, A; Seca, L; Fernandes, R; Dupouy, P
    Background: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is not firmly established as a guide to treatment in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Primary goals were to evaluate the impact of integrating FFR on management decisions and on clinical outcome of patients with ACS undergoing coronary angiography, as compared with patients with stable coronary artery disease. Methods and results: R3F (French FFR Registry) and POST-IT (Portuguese Study on the Evaluation of FFR-Guided Treatment of Coronary Disease), sharing a common design, were pooled as PRIME-FFR (Insights From the POST-IT and R3F Integrated Multicenter Registries - Implementation of FFR in Routine Practice). Investigators prospectively defined management strategy based on angiography before performing FFR. Final decision after FFR and 1-year clinical outcome were recorded. From 1983 patients, in whom FFR was prospectively used to guide treatment, 533 sustained ACS (excluding acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction). In ACS, FFR was performed in 1.4 lesions per patient, mostly in left anterior descending (58%), with a mean percent stenosis of 58±12% and a mean FFR of 0.82±0.09. In patients with ACS, reclassification by FFR was high and similar to those with non-ACS (38% versus 39%; P=NS). The pattern of reclassification was different, however, with less patients with ACS reclassified from revascularization to medical treatment compared with those with non-ACS (P=0.01). In ACS, 1-year outcome of patients reclassified based on FFR (FFR against angiography) was as good as that of nonreclassified patients (FFR concordant with angiography), with no difference in major cardiovascular event (8.0% versus 11.6%; P=0.20) or symptoms (92.3% versus 94.8% angina free; P=0.25). Moreover, FFR-based deferral to medical treatment was as safe in patients with ACS as in patients with non-ACS (major cardiovascular event, 8.0% versus 8.5%; P=0.83; revascularization, 3.8% versus 5.9%; P=0.24; and freedom from angina, 93.6% versus 90.2%; P=0.35). These findings were confirmed in ACS explored at the culprit lesion. In patients (6%) in whom the information derived from FFR was disregarded, a dire outcome was observed. Conclusions: Routine integration of FFR into the decision-making process of ACS patients with obstructive coronary artery disease is associated with a high reclassification rate of treatment (38%). A management strategy guided by FFR, divergent from that suggested by angiography, including revascularization deferral, is safe in ACS.
    2017-06Journal article Open access Show more
  • Next-Generation Sequencing of Hereditary Hemochromatosis-Related Genes: Novel Likely Pathogenic Variants Found in the Portuguese Population
    Publication . Faria, R; Silva, B; Silva, C; Loureiro, P; Queiroz, A; Fraga, S; Esteves, J; Mendes, D; Fleming, R; Vieira, L; Gonçalves, J; Faustino, P
    Hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by excessive iron absorption resulting in pathologically increased body iron stores. It is typically associated with common HFE gene mutation (p.Cys282Tyr and p.His63Asp). However, in Southern European populations up to one third of HH patients do not carry the risk genotypes. This study aimed to explore the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology to analyse a panel of iron metabolism-related genes (HFE, TFR2, HJV, HAMP, SLC40A1, and FTL) in 87 non-classic HH Portuguese patients. A total of 1241 genetic alterations were detected corresponding to 53 different variants, 13 of which were not described in the available public databases. Among them, five were predicted to be potentially pathogenic: three novel mutations in TFR2 [two missense (p.Leu750Pro and p.Ala777Val) and one intronic splicing mutation (c.967-1G>C)], one missense mutation in HFE (p.Tyr230Cys), and one mutation in the 5'-UTR of HAMP gene (c.-25G>A). The results reported here illustrate the usefulness of NGS for targeted iron metabolism-related gene panels, as a likely cost-effective approach for molecular genetics diagnosis of non-classic HH patients. Simultaneously, it has contributed to the knowledge of the pathophysiology of those rare iron metabolism-related disorders.
    2016-10Journal article Open access Show more
  • Short and Long-Term Clinical Impact of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Portugal According to Different Access Routes: Data from the Portuguese National Registry of TAVI
    Publication . Guerreiro, C; Carrilho Ferreira, P; Campante Teles, R; Braga, P; Canas da Silva, P; Patrício, L; Silva, JC; Baptista, J; Sousa Almeida, M; Gama Ribeiro, V; Silva, B; Brito, J; Infante Oliveira, E; Cacela, D; Madeira, S; Silveira, J
    Introduction: The Portuguese National Registry of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation records prospectively the characteristics and outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures in Portugal. Objectives: To assess the 30-day and one-year outcomes of TAVI procedures in Portugal. Methods: We compared TAVI results according to the principal access used (transfemoral (TF) vs. non-transfemoral (non-TF)). Cumulative survival curves according to access route, other procedural and clinical variables were obtained. The Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) composite endpoint of early (30-days) safety was assessed. VARC-2 predictors of 30-days and 1-year all-cause mortality were identified. Results: Between January 2007 and December 2018, 2346 consecutive patients underwent TAVI (2242 native, 104 valve-in-valve; mean age 81±7 years, 53.2% female, EuroSCORE-II - EuroS-II, 4.3%). Device success was 90.1% and numerically lower for non-TF (87.0%). Thirty-day all-cause mortality was 4.8%, with the TF route rendering a lower mortality rate (4.3% vs. 10.1%, p=0.001) and higher safety endpoint (86.4% vs. 72.6%, p<0.001). The one-year all-cause mortality rate was 11.4%, and was significantly lower for TF patients (10.5% vs. 19.4%, p<0.002). After multivariate analysis, peripheral artery disease, previous percutaneous coronary intervention, left ventricular dysfunction and NYHA class III-IV were independent predictors of 30-day all-cause mortality. At one-year follow-up, NYHA class III-IV, non-TF route and occurrence of life-threatening bleeding predicted mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of the first year of follow-up shows decreased survival for patients with an EuroS-II>5% (p<0.001) and who underwent non-TF TAVI (p<0.001). Conclusion: Data from our national real-world registry showed that TAVI was safe and effective. The use of a non-transfemoral approach demonstrated safety in the short term. Long-term prognosis was, however, adversely associated with this route, with comorbidities and the baseline clinical status.
    2020Journal article Open access Show more
  • Usefulness of Routine Fractional Flow Reserve for Clinical Management of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Diabetes
    Publication . Van Belle, E; Cosenza, A; Bravo Baptista, S; Vincent, F; Henderson, J; Santos, L; Ramos, R; Pouillot, C; Calé, R; Cuisset, T; Jorge, E; Teiger, E; Machado, C; Belle, L; Costa, M; Barreau, D; Oliveira, E; Hanssen, M; Costa, J; Besnard, C; Nunes, L; Dallongeville, J; Sideris, G; Bretelle, C; Fonseca, N; Lhoest, N; Guardado, J; Silva, B; Sousa, MJ; Barnay, P; Silva, JC; Leborgne, L; Rodrigues, A; Porouchani, S; Seca, L; Fernandes, R; Dupouy, P; Raposo, L
    Importance: Approximately one-third of patients considered for coronary revascularization have diabetes, which is a major determinant of clinical outcomes, often influencing the choice of the revascularization strategy. The usefulness of fractional flow reserve (FFR) to guide treatment in this population is understudied and has been questioned. Objective: To evaluate the usefulness and rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) of integrating FFR in management decisions for patients with diabetes who undergo coronary angiography. Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study used data from the PRIME-FFR study derived from the merger of the POST-IT study (Portuguese Study on the Evaluation of FFR-Guided Treatment of Coronary Disease [March 2012-November 2013]) and R3F study (French Study of FFR Integrated Multicenter Registries Implementation of FFR in Routine Practice [October 2008-June 2010]), 2 prospective multicenter registries that shared a common design. A population of all-comers for whom angiography disclosed ambiguous lesions was analyzed for rates, patterns, and outcomes associated with management reclassification, including revascularization deferral, in patients with vs without diabetes. Data analysis was performed from June to August 2018. Main outcomes and measures: Death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization (MACE) at 1 year. Results: Among 1983 patients (1503 [77%] male; mean [SD] age, 65 [10] years), 701 had diabetes, and FFR was performed for 1.4 lesions per patient (58.2% of lesions in the left anterior descending artery; mean [SD] stenosis, 56% [11%]; mean [SD] FFR, 0.81 [0.01]). Reclassification by FFR was high and similar in patients with and without diabetes (41.2% vs 37.5%, P = .13), but reclassification from medical treatment to revascularization was more frequent in the former (142 of 342 [41.5%] vs 230 of 730 [31.5%], P = .001). There was no statistical difference between the 1-year rates of MACE in reclassified (9.7%) and nonreclassified patients (12.0%) (P = .37). Among patients with diabetes, FFR-based deferral identified patients with a lower risk of MACE at 12 months (25 of 296 [8.4%]) compared with those undergoing revascularization (47 of 257 [13.1%]) (P = .04), and the rate was of the same magnitude of the observed rate among deferred patients without diabetes (7.9%, P = .87). Status of insulin treatment had no association with outcomes. Patients (6.6% of the population) in whom FFR was disregarded had the highest MACE rates regardless of diabetes status. Conclusions and relevance: Routine integration of FFR for the management of coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes may be associated with a high rate of treatment reclassification. Management strategies guided by FFR, including revascularization deferral, may be useful for patients with diabetes.
    2020Journal article Open access Show more