Browsing by Author "Viana, H"
Now showing 1 - 10 of 44
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Acute Allograft Kidney Dysfunction 18 Years After TransplantationPublication . Viana, H; Mesquita, I; Aires, I; Carvalho, F; Nolasco, F
- Acute Kidney Injury Associated with COVID-19 Infection: a Case ReportPublication . Duarte, T; Caeiro, F; Góis, M; Matos, A; Viana, H; Vieira, C; Paulos, J; Paixão, P; Matos, B; Germano, N; Nolasco, FSARS-Cov2 infection is a highly transmissible disease associated with serious pulmonary disease. Renal involvement is frequent and associated with poor prognosis; however, mechanisms of kidney injury are not well established. We present a SARS-Cov2 patient with severe acute kidney injury. Kidney biopsy findings revealed a pattern of acute tubular necrosis with isometric vacuolization of the proximal tubule. The interstitium and glomeruli were normal. Electronic microscopy showed multiple viral-like particles in both the glomeruli and proximal tubule. This case study shows how SARS-Cov 2 infection can result in different kinds of kidney lesion.
- Acute Kidney Injury in an HIV and HCV PatientPublication . Viana, H; Mesquita, I; Calado, J; Nolasco, F; Carvalho, F
- Amiloidose. Caracterização Epidemiológica, Clínica e MorfológicaPublication . Viana, H; Carvalho, F; Veloso, H; Galvão, MJ; Santos, AR; Ribeiro Santos, JIntrodução: A amiloidose é uma doença sistémica, cujo diagnóstico cabe frequentemente ao nefrologista. O tipo de amiloidose varia de acordo com o grau de desenvolvimento do país, com maior prevalência de amiloidose AL nos países ricos. Material e métodos: Revisão retrospectiva de todas as biopsias de rim nativo avaliadas no serviço entre 1981 e 2008. Caracterização clínica dos doentes à data da biópsia. Avaliação morfológica qualitativa do tipo de substância amiloíde por imunofluorescência e imunoperoxidase. Avaliação semi-quantitativa do grau de depósitos de acordo com a sua localização; grau de glomeruloesclerose e fibrose tubulo -interstical. Resultados: Neste período de 28 anos, observámos 202 biópsias positivas para substância amiloíde (3,5% de 5797) num total de 197 doentes (54,4% homens vs 45,5 mulheres), com idade mediana de 59,5 ± 15,6 anos. A maioria (68%) dos doentes foi biopsada por síndrome nefrótico. A insuficiência renal e as alterações assintomáticas urinárias foram os outros principais motivos de biopsia em 15 % e 7% dos casos, respectivamente. Os doentes na altura da biopsia apresentavam proteinúria mediana de 5 g/dia ± 5,4 (n=144) e creatinina mediana de 1,3 ± 1,7 mg/dl (n=150). As amiloidoses foram classificadas como AA em 51% dos casos, AL em 31,6% (25,5% lambda e 5,9% kappa) e Polineuropatia Amiloidótica Familiar em 3,5%. Não foi possível a caracterização do tipo de amilóide, por dificuldade técnica, em 12,8% das biópsias. A amiloidose revelou-se a terceira causa de síndrome nefrótico nos doentes com mais de 65 anos. Os doentes com amiloidose primária são significativamente mais velhos do que aqueles com amiloidose secundária ou PAF (65,2 vs 53,7 vs 52,7 respectivamente, p <0,05).Verificámos uma diminuição da incidência das amiloidoses AA com aumento das AL, com inversão do predomínio das AA em relação as AL a partir de 1995. Em termos morfológicos, a maioria das biópsias caracteriza-se por deposição marcada de amilóide no glomérulo (30% com +++) e nos vasos (40% com +++), com escassa deposição a nível intersticial cortical (60% sem depósitos) e medular (50% sem depósitos). Estudámos as possíveis relações entre manifestações clínicas e morfologia renal. Verificámos uma correlação positiva entre creatinina e grau de fibrose e/ou grau de deposição intersticial. Não encontrámos relação entre proteinúria e grau/local de deposição de amilóide. Conclusões: Actualmente, em Portugal, predomina a amiloidose AL, que surge em doentes mais idosos e se manifesta mais frequentemente por sindrome nefrótico. A função renal a data da biópsia correlaciona-se com o grau de fibrose tubulo-interstical renal.
- Anemia, Thrombocytopenia and Acute Kidney Injury. A Diagnostic ChallengePublication . Cardoso Fernandes, S; Ferreira, AC; Góis, M; Viana, H; Nolasco, F
- Anti-Phospholipase A2 Receptor Antibodies in the Diagnosis of Idiopathic Membranous NephropathyPublication . Meneses, G; Viana, H; Santos, MC; Ferreira, C; Calado, J; Carvalho, F; Remédio, F; Nolasco, FCirculating anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibodies (anti-PLA2R) have been described in 70% to 80% of the patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN), but not in patients with secondary membranous nephropathy or other glomerular diseases. The goal of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the assay for anti-PLA2R in the diagnosis of iMN. Anti-PLA2R IgG, Elisa and immunofluorescence tests were used to detect circulating anti-PLA2R. These tests were applied in 53 patients who had a kidney biopsy. Of these, 38 had histological diagnosis of membranous nephropathy (MN) and the remaining had other glomerular diseases. The MN was classified as idiopathic in 33 patients after clinical exclusion of secondary causes. Anti-PLA2R were positive in 57.6% of the patients with iMN. All patients with secondary membranous nephropathy or other glomerular diseases did not show circulating anti-PLA2R. The sensitivity was 57.6% (CI 39.2-74.5) and specificity 100% (CI 47.8-100), AUC 0.788; p < 0.0001 for the detection of iMN. 71.4% of the iMN patients that tested negative for anti-PLA2R were in partial or complete remission. The detection of anti-PLA2R in the studied population had a specificity of 100% for the iMN diagnosis. Prior treatments seem to make the test negative and contribute to a lower sensitivity.
- Atheroembolic Renal Disease As a Cause of Allograft Primary Non-FunctionPublication . Viana, H; Ferreira, C; Carvalho, F; Santos, AR; Galvão, MJ; Remédio, F; Nolasco, FAtheroembolic renal disease, also referred to as cholesterol crystal embolization, is a rare cause of renal failure, secondary to occlusion of renal arteries, renal arterioles and glomerular capillaries with cholesterol crystals, originating from atheromatous plaques of the aorta and other major arteries. This disease can occur very rarely in kidney allografts in an early or a late clinical form. Renal biopsy seems to be a reliable diagnostic test and cholesterol clefts are the pathognomonic finding. However, the renal biopsy has some limitations as the typical lesion is focal and can be easily missed in a biopsy fragment. The clinical course of these patients varies from complete recovery of the renal function to permanent graft loss. Statins, acetylsalicyclic acid, and corticosteroids have been used to improve the prognosis. We report a case of primary allograft dysfunction caused by an early and massive atheroembolic renal disease. Distinctive histology is presented in several consecutive biopsies. We evaluated all the cases of our Unit and briefly reviewed the literature. Atheroembolic renal disease is a rare cause of allograft primary non -function but may become more prevalent as acceptance of aged donors and recipients for transplantation has become more frequent.
- C4d Detection in Renal Allograft Biopsies: Immunohistochemistry vs. ImmunofluorescencePublication . Santos, A; Viana, H; Galvão, MJ; Carvalho, F; Nolasco, FIntroduction. Peritubular capillary complement 4d staining is one of the criteria for the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection, and research into this is essential to kidney allograft evaluation. The immunofluorescence technique applied to frozen sections is the present gold-standard method for complement 4d staining and is used routinely in our laboratory. The immunohistochemistry technique applied to paraffin-embedded tissue may be used when no frozen tissue is available. Material and Methods. The aim of this study is to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemistry compared with immunofluorescence. We describe the advantages and disadvantages of the immunohistochemistry vs. the immunofluorescence technique. For this purpose complement 4d staining was performed retrospectively by the two methods in indication biopsies (n=143) and graded using the Banff 07 classification. Results. There was total classification agreement between methods in 87.4% (125/143) of cases. However, immunohistochemistry staining caused more difficulties in interpretation, due to nonspecific staining in tubular cells and surrounding interstitium. All cases negative by immunofluorescence were also negative by immunohistochemistry. The biopsies were classified as positive in 44.7% (64/143) of cases performed by immunofluorescence vs. 36.4% (52/143) performed by immunohistochemistry. Fewer biopsies were classified as positive diffuse in the immunohistochemistry group(25.1% vs. 31.4%) and more as positive focal (13.2% vs. 11.1%). More cases were classified as negative by immunohistochemistry (63.6% vs. 55.2%). Study by ROC curve showed immunohistochemistry has a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 81.2% in relation to immunofluorescence (AUC: 0.906; 95% confidence interval: 0.846-0.949; p=0.0001). Conclusions. The immunohistochemistry method presents an excellent specificity but lower sensitivity to C4d detection in allograft dysfunction. The evaluation is more difficult, requiring a more experienced observer than the immunofluorescence method. Based on these results, we conclude that the immunohistochemistry technique can safely be used when immunofluorescence is not available.
- C4d Presence in Kidney Allograft Biopsy: Sensitivity and Specifity of Immunoperoxidase vs ImmunofluorescencePublication . Viana, H; Carvalho, F; Santos, A; Galvão, MJ; Nolasco, FOBJECTIVES: Evaluate the sensitivity/specificity of immunoperoxidase method in comparison with the standard immunofluorescence. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 87 biopsies made for allograft dysfunction. Immunofluorescence (IF) was performed in frozen allograft biopsies using monoclonal antibody anti-C4d from Quidel®. The indirect immunoperoxidase (IP) technique was performed in paraffin-embebbed tissue with polyclonal antiserum from Serotec®. Biopsies were independently evaluated by two nephropathologist according Banff 2007 classification. RESULTS: By IF, peritubular C4d deposition were detected in 60 biopsies and absent in 27 biopsies. The evaluation of biopsy by IP was less precise due to the presence of background and unspecific staining. We find 13.8% (12/87) of false negative and Banff classification concordance in 79.3% (69/87) of cases (table1). The ROC curve study reveal a specificity of 100% and sensitivity of 80.0 % of IP method in relation to the gold standard (area under curve:0.900; 95% Confidence interval :0.817-0.954; p=0.0001). Banff Classification C4d Cases Immunofluorescence Immunoperoxidase n =87 Diffuse Negative 3 (3.4%) Focal Negative 9 (10.3%) Negative Negative 27 (31.0%) Diffuse Diffuse 33 (37.9%) Focal Focal 9 (10.3%) Diffuse Focal 6 (6.9%) CONCLUSION: The IP method presents a good specificity, but lesser sensitivity to C4d detection in allograft dysfunction. The evaluation is more difficult, requiring more experience of the observer than IF method. If frozen tissue is unavailable, the use of IP for C4d detection is acceptable.
- Cavernous Sinus Thrombosis in a Patient with Nephrotic SyndromePublication . Navarro, D; Ferreira, AC; Viana, H; Carvalho, F; Nolasco, F