Repository logo
 
Publication

Time to Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling after Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Better Late than Never

dc.contributor.authorViveiros Monteiro, A
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, MM
dc.contributor.authorCunha, PS
dc.contributor.authorNogueira da Silva, M
dc.contributor.authorFeliciano, J
dc.contributor.authorBranco, LM
dc.contributor.authorRio, P
dc.contributor.authorPimenta, R
dc.contributor.authorDelgado, AS
dc.contributor.authorCruz Ferreira, R
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-24T16:44:14Z
dc.date.available2016-03-24T16:44:14Z
dc.date.issued2016-03
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR), defined as reduction of end-diastolic and end-systolic dimensions and improvement of ejection fraction, is associated with the prognostic implications of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The time course of LVRR remains poorly characterized. Nevertheless, it has been suggested that it occurs ≤6 months after CRT. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the long-term echocardiographic and clinical evolution of patients with LVRR occurring >6 months after CRT and to identify predictors of a delayed LVRR response. METHODS: A total of 127 consecutive patients after successful CRT implantation were divided into three groups according to LVRR response: Group A, 19 patients (15%) with LVRR after >6 months (late LVRR); Group B, 58 patients (46%) with LVRR before 6 months (early LVRR); and Group C, 50 patients (39%) without LVRR during follow-up (no LVRR). RESULTS: The late LVRR group was older, more often had ischemic etiology and fewer patients were in NYHA class ≤II. Overall, group A presented LVRR between group B and C. This was also the case with the percentage of clinical response (68.4% vs. 94.8% vs. 38.3%, respectively, p<0.001), and hospital readmissions due to decompensated heart failure (31.6% vs. 12.1% vs. 57.1%, respectively, p<0.001). Ischemic etiology (OR 0.044; p=0.013) and NYHA functional class <III (OR 0.056; p=0.063) were the variables with the highest predictive value for late LVRR. CONCLUSIONS: Late LVRR has better clinical and echocardiographic outcomes than no LVRR, although with a suboptimal response compared to the early LVRR population. Ischemic etiology and NYHA functional class <III are predictors of late LVRR.pt_PT
dc.identifier.citationRev Port Cardiol. 2016 Mar;35(3):161-7pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.repc.2015.11.008pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/2447
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherSociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologiapt_PT
dc.subjectHSM CARpt_PT
dc.subjectCardiac Resynchronization Therapypt_PT
dc.subjectEchocardiographypt_PT
dc.subjectHeart Failurept_PT
dc.subjectMyocardial Ischemia/etiology
dc.subjectPrognosis
dc.subjectVentricular Remodeling
dc.titleTime to Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling after Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Better Late than Neverpt_PT
dc.title.alternativeTempo para a Remodelagem Inversa do Ventrículo Esquerdo: Mais Vale Tarde do que Nuncapt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage167pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage161pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleRevista Portuguesa de Cardiologiapt_PT
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
RPC 2016 161.pdf
Size:
310.96 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections