Repository logo

Browsing by Author "Pinto, N"

Now showing 1 - 8 of 8
  • Cateter Ciático Popliteu: Uma Aposta Segura?
    Publication . Silva, B; Pinto, N; Ferreira, T
    O bloqueio contínuo de nervos periféricos (BCNP), descrito inicialmente em 1946 (1), consiste na colocação e utilização de um cateter percutâneo adjacente a um ou vários nervos periféricos para administração de anestésico local. A utilização de cateteres perineurais permite prologar a analgesia associada a técnica single shot, que dura, habitualmente, 24 horas. Apesar de bem estudado para analgesia no pos-operatório, o BCNP tem actualmente várias indicações descritas como tratamento de soluços(2), de vasospasmo associado a Doença de Raynaud (3), simpaticectomia e vasodilatação após cirurgia vascular (4), reimplantação de membros amputados(5), analgesia em trauma(6) e tratamento de dor cronica (7). Apesar de estar provado que no tratamento da dor pós-operatória o uso de cateteres perineurais permite uma analgesia mais eficaz comparativamente a analgesia com opióides sistémicos (reduzindo assim a incidência de complicações associadas ao uso destes) (8) e que melhora, a curto prazo, outcomes funcionais após cirurgia da extremidade, não esta evidenciado o beneficio desta técnica regional a longo prazo (9,10,11). Considerando a eficácia da técnica loco-regional para o tratamento da dor neuropática associada a doença arterial periférica (12,13) e a segurança associada ao bloqueio de nervo periférico (8,9,10,11), relata-se um caso de utilização desta técnica num doente para tratamento da agudização de dor crónica secundária a um agravamento da isquémia do membro inferior.
    2013Journal article Open access Show more
  • Cisatracúrio – Um Relaxante Neuromuscular “Seguro”?
    Publication . Gonçalves, T; Pita, JS; Pinto, N; Ornelas, C; Leiria-Pinto, P
    Os agentes anestésicos representam uma causa importante de anafilaxia a fármacos, sendo os relaxantes neuromusculares (RNM) dos principais responsáveis pelos casos de anafilaxia perioperatória. O cisatracúrio é o RNM mais recente, sendo um estereoisómero do atracúrio que se acreditava não ter potencial de libertação de histamina e, consequentemente, causar menos reações alérgicas do que os outros RNM. No entanto, têm sido relatados vários casos de reação anafilática grave após administração de cisatracúrio, não existindo, do nosso conhecimento, registo na literatura de nenhum em Portugal. As autoras apresentam dois casos de anafilaxia perioperatória grave (grau 4 na escala de Ring & Messmer) com paragem cardiorrespiratória. Na investigação alergológica foram realizados testes cutâneos, cujos intradérmicos se revelaram positivos para o cisatracúrio (1:100) em ambos os doentes. É importante alertar que este RNM não será tão desprovido de potencial alergénico como previamente pensado e esse facto deve ser considerado na investigação de uma reação alérgica que ocorra durante a indução anestésica.
    2022Journal article Open access Show more
  • Cross-Cultural Validation of the Portuguese from Portugal Version of the Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK) Questionnaire
    Publication . Leiria-Pinto, P; Marques, J; Finelli, E; Alves, C; Alves, M; Trincão, D; Pinto, N; Carreiro-Martins, P; Papoila, AL; Neuparth, N
    Introduction. The Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK) is a tool to assess asthma control in preschool children. This study aims to validate the Portuguese from Portugal version of the TRACK questionnaire. Methods. A prospective cohort study was carried out to assess their psychometric characteristics. Caregivers of 141 children under age 5 with asthma symptoms were enrolled. Results. Internal reliability was close to 0.70 (Cronbach's α). The test-retest reliability was 0.87. TRACK scores were different between well, partially, and non-controlled asthma groups (p less than 0.001). Patients rated as having better control showed an increase in TRACK scores. Conclusions. The Portuguese version of the TRACK questionnaire is accurate and reliable for monitoring asthma control. Its use may help to overcome challenges with the management of this age group.
    2021Journal article Open access Show more
  • Feasibility and Acceptability of an Asthma App to Monitor Medication Adherence: Mixed Methods Study
    Publication . Jácome, C; Almeida, R; Pereira, AM; Amaral, R; Mendes, S; Alves-Correia, M; Vidal, C; López Freire, S; Méndez Brea, P; Araújo, L; Couto, M; Antolín-Amérigo, D; de la Hoz Caballer, B; Barra Castro, A; Gonzalez-De-Olano, D; Todo Bom, A; Azevedo, J; Leiria Pinto, P; Pinto, N; Castro Neves, A; Palhinha, Ana; Todo Bom, F; Costa, A; Chaves Loureiro, C; Maia Santos, L; Arrobas, A; Valério, M; Cardoso, J; Emiliano, M; Gerardo, R; Cidrais Rodrigues, JC; Oliveira, G; Carvalho, J; Mendes, A; Lozoya, C; Santos, N; Menezes, F; Gomes, R; Câmara, R; Rodrigues Alves, R; Moreira, AS; Bordalo, D; Alves, C; Ferreira, JA; Lopes, C; Silva, D; Vasconcelos, MJ; Teixeira, MF; Ferreira-Magalhães, M; Taborda-Barata, L; Cálix, MJ; Alves, A; Almeida Fonseca, J
    Background: Poor medication adherence is a major challenge in asthma, and objective assessment of inhaler adherence is needed. The InspirerMundi app aims to monitor adherence while providing a positive experience through gamification and social support. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the InspirerMundi app to monitor medication adherence in adolescents and adults with persistent asthma (treated with daily inhaled medication). Methods: A 1-month mixed method multicenter observational study was conducted in 26 secondary care centers from Portugal and Spain. During an initial face-to-face visit, physicians reported patients' asthma therapeutic plan in a structured questionnaire. During the visits, patients were invited to use the app daily to register their asthma medication intakes. A scheduled intake was considered taken when patients registered the intake (inhaler, blister, or other drug formulation) by using the image-based medication detection tool. At 1 month, patients were interviewed by phone, and app satisfaction was assessed on a 1 (low) to 5 (high) scale. Patients were also asked to point out the most and least preferred app features and make suggestions for future app improvements. Results: A total of 107 patients (median 27 [P25-P75 14-40] years) were invited, 92.5% (99/107) installed the app, and 73.8% (79/107) completed the 1-month interview. Patients interacted with the app a median of 9 (P25-P75 1-24) days. At least one medication was registered in the app by 78% (77/99) of patients. A total of 53% (52/99) of participants registered all prescribed inhalers, and 34% (34/99) registered the complete asthma therapeutic plan. Median medication adherence was 75% (P25-P75 25%-90%) for inhalers and 82% (P25-P75 50%-94%) for other drug formulations. Patients were globally satisfied with the app, with 75% (59/79) scoring ≥4,; adherence monitoring, symptom monitoring, and gamification features being the most highly scored components; and the medication detection tool among the lowest scored. A total of 53% (42/79) of the patients stated that the app had motivated them to improve adherence to inhaled medication and 77% (61/79) would recommend the app to other patients. Patient feedback was reflected in 4 major themes: medication-related features (67/79, 85%), gamification and social network (33/79, 42%), symptom monitoring and physician communication (21/79, 27%), and other aspects (16/79, 20%). Conclusions: The InspirerMundi app was feasible and acceptable to monitor medication adherence in patients with asthma. Based on patient feedback and to increase the registering of medications, the therapeutic plan registration and medication detection tool were redesigned. Our results highlight the importance of patient participation to produce a patient-centered and engaging mHealth asthma app.
    2021-05-25Journal article Open access Show more
  • Monitoring Adherence to Asthma Inhalers Using the InspirerMundi App: Analysis of Real-World, Medium-Term Feasibility Studies
    Publication . Jácome, C; Almeida, R; Pereira, AM; Amaral, R; Vieira-Marques, P; Mendes, S; Alves-Correia, M; Ferreira, JA; Lopes, I; Gomes, J; Araújo, L; Couto, M; Chaves Loureiro, C; Maia Santos, L; Arrobas, A; Valério, M; Todo Bom, A; Azevedo, J; Teixeira, MF; Ferreira-Magalhães, M; Leiria Pinto, P; Pinto, N; Castro Neves, A; Morête, A; Todo Bom, F; Costa, A; Silva, D; Vasconcelos, MJ; Falcão, H; Marques, ML; Mendes, A; Cardoso, J; Cidrais Rodrigues, JC; Oliveira, G; Carvalho, J; Lozoya, C; Santos, N; Menezes, F; Gomes, R; Câmara, R; Rodrigues Alves, R; Moreira, AS; Abreu, C; Silva, R; Bordalo, D; Alves, C; Lopes, C; Taborda-Barata, L; Fernandes, RM; Ferreira, R; Chaves-Loureiro, C; Cálix, MJ; Alves, A; Almeida Fonseca, J
    Background: Poor medication adherence is a major challenge in asthma and objective assessment of inhaler adherence is needed. InspirerMundi app aims to monitor inhaler adherence while turning it into a positive experience through gamification and social support. Objective: We assessed the medium-term feasibility of the InspirerMundi app to monitor inhaler adherence in real-world patients with persistent asthma (treated with daily inhaled medication). In addition, we attempted to identify the characteristics of the patients related to higher app use. Methods: Two real-world multicenter observational studies, with one initial face-to-face visit and a 4-month telephone interview, were conducted in 29 secondary care centers from Portugal. During an initial face-to-face visit, patients were invited to use the app daily to register their asthma medication intakes. A scheduled intake was considered taken when patients took a photo of the medication (inhaler, blister, or others) using the image-based medication detection tool. Medication adherence was calculated as the number of doses taken as a percentage of the number scheduled. Interacting with the app ≥30 days was used as the cut-off for higher app use. Results: A total of 114 patients {median 20 [percentile 25 to percentile 75 (P25-P75) 16-36] years, 62% adults} were invited, 107 (94%) installed the app and 83 (73%) completed the 4-month interview. Patients interacted with the app for a median of 18 [3-45] days, translated on a median use rate of 15 [3-38]%. Median inhaler adherence assessed through the app was 34 [4-73]% when considering all scheduled inhalations for the study period. Inhaler adherence assessed was not significantly correlated with self-reported estimates. Median adherence for oral and other medication was 41 [6-83]% and 43 [3-73]%, respectively. Patients with higher app use were slightly older (p = 0.012), more frequently taking medication for other health conditions (p = 0.040), and more frequently prescribed long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA, p = 0.024). After 4 months, Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test (CARAT) scores improved (p < 0.001), but no differences between patients interacting with the app for 30 days or less were seen. Conclusions: The InspirerMundi app was feasible to monitor inhaler adherence in patients with persistent asthma. The persistent use of this mHealth technology varies widely. A better understanding of characteristics related to higher app use is still needed before effectiveness studies are undertaken.
    2021Journal article Open access Show more
  • Patient-Physician Discordance in Assessment of Adherence to Inhaled Controller Medication: a Cross-Sectional Analysis of Two Cohorts
    Publication . Jácome, C; Pereira, AM; Almeida, R; Ferreira-Magalhaes, M; Couto, M; Araujo, L; Pereira, M; Alves Correia, M; Chaves Loureiro, C; Catarata, MJ; Maia Santos, L; Pereira, J; Ramos, B; Lopes, C; Mendes, A; Cidrais Rodrigues, JC; Oliveira, G; Aguiar, AP; Afonso, I; Carvalho, J; Arrobas, A; Coutinho Costa, J; Dias, J; Todo Bom, A; Azevedo, J; Ribeiro, C; Alves, M; Leiria Pinto, P; Neuparth, N; Palhinha, A; Gaspar Marques, J; Pinto, N; Martins, P; Todo Bom, F; Alvarenga Santos, M; Gomes Costa, A; Silva Neto, A; Santalha, M; Lozoya, C; Santos, N; Silva, D; Vasconcelos, MJ; Taborda-Barata, L; Carvalhal, C; Teixeira, MF; Rodrigues Alves, R; Moreira, AS; Sofia Pinto, C; Morais Silva, P; Alves, C; Câmara, R; Coelho, D; Bordalo, D; Fernandes, R; Ferreira, R; Menezes, F; Gomes, R; Calix, MJ; Marques, A; Cardoso, J; Emiliano, M; Gerardo, R; Nunes, C; Câmara, R; Ferreira, JA; Carvalho, A; Freitas, P; Correia, R; Fonseca, J
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare patient's and physician's ratings of inhaled medication adherence and to identify predictors of patient-physician discordance. DESIGN: Baseline data from two prospective multicentre observational studies. SETTING: 29 allergy, pulmonology and paediatric secondary care outpatient clinics in Portugal. PARTICIPANTS: 395 patients (≥13 years old) with persistent asthma. MEASURES: Data on demographics, patient-physician relationship, upper airway control, asthma control, asthma treatment, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and healthcare use were collected. Patients and physicians independently assessed adherence to inhaled controller medication during the previous week using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Discordance was defined as classification in distinct VAS categories (low 0-50; medium 51-80; high 81-100) or as an absolute difference in VAS scores ≥10 mm. Correlation between patients' and physicians' VAS scores/categories was explored. A multinomial logistic regression identified the predictors of physician overestimation and underestimation. RESULTS: High inhaler adherence was reported both by patients (median (percentile 25 to percentile 75) 85 (65-95) mm; 53% VAS>80) and by physicians (84 (68-95) mm; 53% VAS>80). Correlation between patient and physician VAS scores was moderate (rs=0.580; p<0.001). Discordance occurred in 56% of cases: in 28% physicians overestimated adherence and in 27% underestimated. Low adherence as assessed by the physician (OR=27.35 (9.85 to 75.95)), FEV1 ≥80% (OR=2.59 (1.08 to 6.20)) and a first appointment (OR=5.63 (1.24 to 25.56)) were predictors of underestimation. An uncontrolled asthma (OR=2.33 (1.25 to 4.34)), uncontrolled upper airway disease (OR=2.86 (1.35 to 6.04)) and prescription of short-acting beta-agonists alone (OR=3.05 (1.15 to 8.08)) were associated with overestimation. Medium adherence as assessed by the physician was significantly associated with higher risk of discordance, both for overestimation and underestimation of adherence (OR=14.50 (6.04 to 34.81); OR=2.21 (1.07 to 4.58)), while having a written action plan decreased the likelihood of discordance (OR=0.25 (0.12 to 0.52); OR=0.41 (0.22 to 0.78)) (R2=44%). CONCLUSION: Although both patients and physicians report high inhaler adherence, discordance occurred in half of cases. Implementation of objective adherence measures and effective communication are needed to improve patient-physician agreement.
    2019-11-07Journal article Open access Show more
  • Short and Extended Provocation Tests Have Similar Negative Predictive Value in Non-Immediate Hypersensitivity to Beta-Lactams in Children
    Publication . Regateiro, FS; Rezende, I; Pinto, N; Abreu, C; Carreiro-Martins, P; Gomes, ER
    Drug provocation tests (DPTs) are the gold-standard method to diagnose non-immediate hypersensitivity reactions (NIHSR) to beta-lactam antibiotics (BL) in children. Our aim was to compare the negative predictive value (NPV) of one-day (short) DPT versus 3-7 days (extended) DPT for the diagnosis of NIHSR to BL in paediatric age. A secondary aim was to compare confidence on drug re-exposure after short and extended negative DPTs.
    2019Journal article Open access Show more
  • Validation of App and Phone Versions of the Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test (CARAT)
    Publication . Jácome, C; Pereira, AM; Almeida, R; Amaral, R; Correia, MA; Mendes, S; Vieira-Marques, P; Ferreira, JA; Lopes, I; Gomes, J; Vidal, C; López Freire, S; Méndez Brea, P; Arrobas, A; Valério, M; Chaves Loureiro, C; Santos, LM; Couto, M; Araujo, L; Todo Bom, A; Azevedo, JP; Cardoso, J; Emiliano, M; Gerardo, R; Lozoya, C; Pinto, PL; Castro Neves, A; Pinto, N; Palhinha, A; Teixeira, F; Ferreira-Magalhães, M; Alves, C; Coelho, D; Santos, N; Menezes, F; Gomes, R; Cidrais Rodrigues, JC; Oliveira, G; Carvalho, J; Rodrigues Alves, R; Moreira, AS; Costa, A; Abreu, C; Silva, R; Morête, A; Falcão, H; Marques, ML; Câmara, R; Cálix, MJ; Bordalo, D; Silva, D; Vasconcelos, MJ; Fernandes, RM; Ferreira, R; Freitas, P; Lopes, F; Almeida Fonseca, J
    2021-06Journal article Open access Show more