Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
449.94 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
In a liver transplant (LT) center, treatments with Prometheus were evaluated. The main outcome considered was 1 and 6 months survival.
Methods. During the study period, 74 patients underwent treatment with Prometheus; 64 were enrolled,with a mean age of 51 13 years; 47men underwent 212 treatments (mean, 3.02 per patient). The parameters evaluated were age, sex, laboratorial (liver enzymes, ammonia)
and clinical (model for end-stage liver disease and Child-Turcotte-Pugh score) data.
Results. Death was verified in 23 patients (35.9%) during the hospitalization period, 20 patients (31.3%) were submitted to liver transplantation, and 21 were discharged. LT was performed in 4 patients with acute liver failure (ALF, 23.7%), in 7 patients with acute on chronic liver failure (AoCLF, 43.7%), and in 6 patients with liver disease after LT (30%).
Seven patients who underwent LT died (35%). In the multivariate analysis, older age (P ¼ .015), higher international normalized ratio (INR) (P ¼ .019), and acute liver failure (P ¼ .039) were independently associated with an adverse 1-month clinical outcome. On the other hand, older age (P ¼ .011) and acute kidney injury (P ¼ .031) at presentation
were both related to worse 6-month outcome. For patients with ALF and AoCLF we did not observe the same differences.
Conclusions. In this cohort, older age was the most important parameter defining 1- and 6-month survival, although higher INR and presence of ALF were important for 1-month survival and AKI for 6-month survival. No difference was observed between patients who underwent LT or did not have LT.
Description
Keywords
End Stage Liver Disease/mortality End Stage Liver Disease/surgery HCC CHBPT HCC UCI Follow-Up Studies Liver Failure, Acute/mortality Liver Failure, Acute/surgery Liver Transplantation/methods Liver Transplantation/mortality Portugal/epidemiology Retrospective Studies Survival Rate/trends Time Factors
Citation
Transplant Proc. 2015 May;47(4):996-1000